Michael Spinks W15 Dwight Qawi

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Wu-Gambino, Aug 6, 2009.


  1. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    332
    Jan 29, 2005
    that's what I say. Evander put on the more impressive performance and this time, Dwight came to fight. It was ALMOST the return of the buzzsaw.

    He sleepwalked in the Spinks fight. It's like he wasnt into the fight at all and didnt care if he won or not.
     
  2. Wu-Gambino

    Wu-Gambino ESB Swordsman Full Member

    336
    2
    Nov 17, 2006
    Qawi didn't seem much different against Spinks than he had against other guys prior to this fight. Admittedly he did struggle in his previous fight against Davis before putting him away, but I believe Davis was simply a tough and game contender at the time. Remember, Davis would go on to give Spinks some problems as well, even lasting the distance.

    Qawi was a bulky but very short light heavy who liked to counter and work the body in close; he did not deal very well with left jabs (which had little on them for him to counter) or movement (as he couldn't plant his feet and unload against a constantly moving target) and showed this in the early rounds of the first Matt Saad fight. Futch saw this and gave Spinks the perfect gameplan, who in turn put on a jab clinic, only using the right hand to get Qawi's respect. Spinks boxed beautifully and had Qawi stalking and reaching out for him to no avail for most of the fight. While Qawi definitely didn't give the decision away, Spinks fought the better fight plain and simple (and this is from a big Qawi fan).

    Holyfield on the other hand tried to trade with Qawi, giving Dwight plenty of opportunites to counter and fire back, hence why Qawi looked more impressive here than against Spinks. In any case Qawi was definitely better at 175 than at cruiser.

    On a side note I've heard rumors of Qawi having a deviated septum before the Spinks fight; as I recall he mentioned having problems with his nose in the Davis post fight interview (correct me if I'm wrong). Nonetheless I think he still would have lost to Mike that night regardless of his condition.
     
  3. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    111
    Oct 9, 2008
    A very tactical fight; not what we all expected..... It is now a hard watch for all 15 rds.... Very slow and dull................ Spinks won big time...........

    MR.BILL
     
  4. DRmullen2

    DRmullen2 Member Full Member

    182
    1
    Aug 2, 2009
    I like Qawi big time.
     
  5. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    53,156
    45,185
    Apr 27, 2005
    It's called establishing early dominance/danger. You need to look a little closer.
     
  6. Arka

    Arka New Member Full Member

    0
    7
    Sep 26, 2008
    Someone had better give me a link for that.:D

    I haven't yet seen a Spinks fight I found dull. His combination of power and all round technical skills is hypnotic to watch.
     
  7. Sonny Carson

    Sonny Carson Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,995
    5
    Jan 7, 2007
  8. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    332
    Jan 29, 2005
    Not if he had done some fighting
     
  9. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    332
    Jan 29, 2005
    Once was enough! Believe me, I have never been tempted to watch it a second time. Worse than Hagler-Duran. This fight was a dud
     
  10. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    93
    Aug 21, 2008
    How do you know "fighting" wouldn't have just gotten him more hurt or even KO'd?
     
  11. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    111
    Oct 9, 2008
    The fight was all hype but no fireworks ever erupted......... Spinks was too cagey, while Qawi pressed like a 3,000 year old midget Mummy...... Christ, even Spinks' trips to the canvas mid way through the sparring match were either nondescript or complete bull****..... Qawi was stepping on toe's........ Peace...

    MR.BILL
     
  12. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    332
    Jan 29, 2005
    The trip to the canvas was the highlight for me. It actually revived me from my coma.
     
  13. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    332
    Jan 29, 2005
    If that were the case, then he shouldnt have taken up boxing as a sport.

    fighters dont just lay back after taking a couple hard shots. If that were the case, Hagler would have just let Tommy Hearns outbox him instead of pressing the fight and getting the knockout.

    Every fighter knows there's a possibility of getting hurt or knocked out but Dwight poses a threat himself. But he didnt come to fight like I said. I wouldnt be surprised he was bought off.

    And besides, these are the kinds of things they work on in training-defense and offense but all Dwight did was throw out a half hearted jab. so I would say that Mike didnt have much of a challenge facing him
     
  14. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    93
    Aug 21, 2008
    :lol: Get outta here!!

    The guy's good enough to be a two-division champ and a HOFer, but he shouldn't have taken up boxing just because ONE solitary fighter ranked among the all time best at his weight class has the ability to shut him down??

    What a crock of nonsense.


    Fighters have been making other fighters do that for as long as the sport has been in existence.


    If it wasn't the case, he wouldn't have let Willie Monroe outbox him.
     
  15. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    332
    Jan 29, 2005
    No one saw the Monroe fight so no one can comment on why he lost. Had Marvin been intimidated by Monroe's power or abilities he wouldnt have come back to lay him out twice over in return matches.

    The reason Dwight lost the match had nothing to do with the volley Spinks threw in the first. that's foolish but it remains the explanation for why Dwight lost.

    The real reason he lost was a lack of offense. In short, he didnt show up to fight. You could see it in the Davis fight. In fact...you could see the change throughout. At the start it was the same Dwight that massacred Saad with an intensity that had to be seen to be believed. It was like the reincarnation of Tony Ayala Jr. But after the first you could see he let up (slowed his attack) and allowed Davis to get back into it, turning it into an actual fight.

    Not trying to take anything away from Mike. I give him his props but he didnt win that fight so much as Dwight lost it.