Michalkzewski HOF worthy?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Liquorice, Feb 19, 2019.



HOF worthy?

  1. Yes

    33 vote(s)
    86.8%
  2. No

    5 vote(s)
    13.2%
  1. HerolGee

    HerolGee VIP Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,015
    Sep 22, 2010
    no wbo was then invalid title
     
    Badbot likes this.
  2. LANCE99

    LANCE99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,556
    6,347
    Mar 11, 2016
    HOF doesn't work this way. You don't get in based on a few wins over other HOFers.
     
    Badbot and HerolGee like this.
  3. Loudon

    Loudon VIP Member Full Member

    39,170
    8,378
    Mar 7, 2012
    I think he could get in one day.

    A very tough fighter.

    Two important questions to ask though:

    1. Why did he feign injury in order to get Roch disqualified in their first fight? (very out of character)

    2. Why didn't he drop the WBO belt after he'd beaten Hill for the WBA and IBF titles?
     
    Badbot likes this.
  4. Liquorice

    Liquorice Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    5,515
    7,671
    May 13, 2018
    This content is protected
     
    pistal47 and Loudon like this.
  5. LANCE99

    LANCE99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,556
    6,347
    Mar 11, 2016
    Regarding #2, the WBO was very lightly regarded back then. It's only in the last, I'd say, 10 years it gained status along the other belts. NOt to mention, historically, their rankings have been some of the worst.

    I never understood why DM (And Joe C to an extent) were so complacent w/ their WBO titles. They also seemed to stave off unification w/ other belts.
     
    Badbot likes this.
  6. Badbot

    Badbot I Am An Actual Pro. Full Member

    36,502
    20,175
    Apr 17, 2011
    Ricky Hatton defended the World Boxing Union (1995-2004) Super Lightweight Title 15 times :lol::facepalm:
     
  7. LANCE99

    LANCE99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,556
    6,347
    Mar 11, 2016
    True. But at least he was active as hell doing so.
     
    Badbot likes this.
  8. Loudon

    Loudon VIP Member Full Member

    39,170
    8,378
    Mar 7, 2012
    For many years, I believed that Dariusz was unfairly stripped of his 2 titles that he won from Virgil Hill. But over the last few years, my opinion has changed.

    I've read that other WBO champs were also stripped of their titles, both before and after Dariusz, as the other main organisations didn't recognise the WBO. And I believe that Dariusz and his advisor simply must have been aware of this, considering that his advisor was an astute businessman, as well as the fact the WBO were originally formed by disgruntled ex-members of the WBA.

    So:

    Could he have kept his 2 main titles had he immediately relinquished his WBO belt?

    Why didn't he immediately relinquish the WBO belt?

    He must have known going into the Hill fight that there were going to be issues afterwards.

    He always gave me the impression that he wasn't too fazed by the decisions. He seemed happy to just keep hold of the WBO belt.

    Regarding Joe, he was too good to repeatedly defend that title. But he obviously kept a hold of it because he was content in doing so, just like Eubank was before him.
     
    Last edited: Feb 19, 2019
    LANCE99 likes this.
  9. Loudon

    Loudon VIP Member Full Member

    39,170
    8,378
    Mar 7, 2012
    True.

    It was typical of Frank W's fighters back in the day. But why didn't Dariusz bin his WBO belt as soon as he'd beaten Hill? Because he must have known going into the fight that the WBA would have issues with it.
     
    Badbot likes this.
  10. HerolGee

    HerolGee VIP Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,015
    Sep 22, 2010
    they kept them to set fake records.
     
  11. LANCE99

    LANCE99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,556
    6,347
    Mar 11, 2016
    Thing about these records, with the number of belts we've had for ages now. TWO can do the same record at the same time. Joe C and Sven Ottke basically did the same thing at the same time. Makes both rather rubbish-ish IMO.,
     
    HerolGee likes this.
  12. AwardedSteak863

    AwardedSteak863 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,890
    8,562
    Aug 16, 2018
    He was a very good fighter but to me he falls short of being a hall of Famer. Would have liked to have seen him against Jones or Maske.
     
  13. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me Full Member

    388,170
    70,120
    Nov 30, 2006
  14. vargasfan1985

    vargasfan1985 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,473
    3,923
    Mar 8, 2008
    Never fighting RJJ hurt his stock

    Best fight at 175 and maybe even in all of boxing at the time

    Still get mad when I think about the fight not happening
     
  15. tinman

    tinman VIP Member Full Member

    30,640
    23,228
    Feb 25, 2015
    Hasnt the HOF already pretty much established that the bar for admission is less than ATG?