Even if Calzaghe did win, it would be close and among the most boring maul ups you ever saw. No one would care.
Nevermind bailey. I had to ignore him because he was talking too much nonsense. He actually asked how was Eubank(Calzaghe fight) more faded than Kessler(Froch) :rofl. You don't argue with those people they are skilled at talking gibberish.
So you had to look up what you had been trying to preach about, when you couldnt just answer the previous questions. I told you earlier that H2H meant head to head
I gave the answer, post #89 H2H = Head to Head P4P = Pound for Pound Yet he still had to publish what I put, and explain to you, whilst trying to pretend he was explaining to me, when its now obvious he didnt know. I gave you facts where Kessler and Eubank were concerned and you couldnt argue those facts
Clearly Calzaghe..... His best wins were not against faded welterweights and no way would a liles or little ever have beat him.