Micheal Nunn vs Calzaghe who wins?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by krishv123, Apr 9, 2011.


  1. Bobo

    Bobo Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,050
    5
    Feb 20, 2011
    i think nunn only lost once by ko/tko, which was obviously toney.
     
  2. DavidChao

    DavidChao A contender,.. a somebody Full Member

    1,224
    0
    Sep 19, 2009
    Well said, and co-signed.
     
  3. Slider75

    Slider75 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,113
    3
    Oct 19, 2008
    Calzaghes 46-0 record (in real life) really do butt hurt some people!:D
     
  4. JunitoJab

    JunitoJab Antagonist Full Member

    5,222
    2
    Nov 17, 2009
    Calzaghe by decision
     
  5. DKD

    DKD Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,439
    316
    Dec 16, 2010
    Even if Calzaghe did win, it would be close and among the most boring maul ups you ever saw.

    No one would care.
     
  6. Calzaghe by split decision.
     
  7. techks

    techks ATG list Killah! Full Member

    19,779
    701
    Dec 6, 2009
    :lol:Nevermind bailey. I had to ignore him because he was talking too much nonsense. He actually asked how was Eubank(Calzaghe fight) more faded than Kessler(Froch) :rofl. You don't argue with those people they are skilled at talking gibberish.
     
  8. joe the great

    joe the great Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,453
    2
    Jul 24, 2004
    Michael Nunn was very talented but I think Calzaghe outpoins him on business. Might be UD or SD.
     
  9. gilad

    gilad Active Member Full Member

    577
    10
    Mar 4, 2006
    Calzaghe by decision
     
  10. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,980
    3,110
    Dec 11, 2009
    :lol: So you had to look up what you had been trying to preach about, when you couldnt just answer th:lol:e previous questions.
    I told you earlier that H2H meant head to head
     
  11. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,980
    3,110
    Dec 11, 2009
    I gave the answer, post #89
    H2H = Head to Head
    P4P = Pound for Pound
    Yet he still had to publish what I put, and explain to you, whilst trying to pretend he was explaining to me, when its now obvious he didnt know.
    I gave you facts where Kessler and Eubank were concerned and you couldnt argue those facts :lol:
     
  12. Stich

    Stich Member Full Member

    144
    0
    Apr 15, 2011
    Clearly Calzaghe.....

    His best wins were not against faded welterweights and no way would a liles or little ever have beat him.