Mickey Walker VS Freddie Steele

Fine I'll destroy every single point you make one last time.

You do not have the authority to call anyone ridiculous. Your the Forums joke.

Get out of your own arse and use the basic functions of the forum and stop being so ****ing arrogant.

That's bollocks. Coz I've seen both fighters on film and have come to the conclusion based on styles that Steele wins. And I'm not the only one.

No one's saying this and it doesn't matter in this thread anyway. Rough wasn't asking which fighters greater, he was asking who'd win.

1. Greatest boxing historians is up for debate.
2. Irrelevant. Tells us nothing of how the fight would go down.
3. Top 10 what? Pfp? Nah he'd struggle to make that. MW? So does ****ing Steele.

Sometimes Revisionists are correct.

And this case (in the case there/we're making) they are, as correct as a hypothetical match can be.

No one's saying that, at most there saying he's a great MW, which most likely correct. Walker was a better WW anyway.

Oh **** off. You didn't live through those times, you didn't live through the 10s and 30s. And it's irrelevant, it's on film, we can watch it. And we're not affected by any bias that they had at the times with writers and TV networks.

We don't, we want civilized, insightful debates and mental challenges about a great sport, you don't bring that.
Have you ever boxed? Like with a ring and another person? Not just in your bedroom shadow boxing.
Coz from the way you talk about greatness and historical ranking in a thread that has nothing to do with that tells me you haven't.

And before you use my age as insult, say I don't know the sport or any other bull**** you use to get out of replying. Don't. It's pointless

 

Well I gave him the attention, can I have a lollipop?

 

Fleischer saw both live from ringside. Walker is ranked 4th all time middleweight . Steele is unranked. Same for Rose. Same for Goldman (top ten),

You can’t go back in time and change history and this history is very well written.

 

Walker is typically included in p4p all time listings. Steele typically not. It’s been that way for decades.

 

Don't you understand Houdini the years experience and historical perspective mean nothing? McGrain an expert!!!! This is funniest of all. These kids will learn they are wrong as they go on. If they love general let them go. Less 110 pd threads. One thing makes me wonder. Butt... I finally realized who someone is by what was said by these adversaries. Explains a lot. They say experts from the past who actually saw these fighters don't matter. What? Just young knowitall minds who have already put themselves on pedastols. Keep rolling bud..

 

Cheers pal.

 

Didn't say that. Can you please show us where either did?

We said that we either don't agree or that they had a bias. Can you now please tell us why Walker has been ranked as high as top 4 MW of all time? When his 160 résumé pales in comparison to Steele's. Pretty Please.

 

Crowcroft you’re a 15 year old child. You know nothing of the sport. Your conclusions equate to your sum worth which is zero. Those that watched both men live rank Walker very very highly. He is typically ranked in all time p4p listings and always listed as a top 5-10 ATG middleweight champion by those who lived through those times. Steele is typically unrated. Period and end of story.