Miguel Cotto is not a great fighter

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Philly-Tough, Sep 8, 2012.


  1. JMP

    JMP Champion Full Member

    18,768
    21
    Dec 5, 2007
    I would agree with the OP that Cotto isn't great, though. He is a good/solid fighter historically, but a very good fighter in comparison to the rest of the fighters his era (as poor as it may be). He will deserve a HOF spot when his career comes to an end for accomplishing as much as he did and giving fans great fights for a decade.
     
  2. blackbolt396

    blackbolt396 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,146
    653
    Feb 13, 2012
    This is why if you are a boxing fan Money and Cotto are true greats not flash in the pans.
     
  3. JMP

    JMP Champion Full Member

    18,768
    21
    Dec 5, 2007
    Goyo Vargas briefly held the WBC at 130. Chavez won the IBF at 135 when he beat Leavander Johnson. Two nice wins for Mayweather there.
     
  4. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,568
    3,760
    May 4, 2012
    Very nice. Hell looking back Cotto has Clottey, Maussa, Mayorga, Bazan and Corley (who Floyd beat as well)


    Crazy how many champs they have on their resume. and Crazy that Cotto didn't turn pro until 4/5 years after Floyd. :nut
     
  5. JMP

    JMP Champion Full Member

    18,768
    21
    Dec 5, 2007

    I'm curious to see how many more Cotto will add before he retires. Trout probably, then maybe Canelo and one or two others would be fantastic.
     
  6. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,568
    3,760
    May 4, 2012
    Hell yeah it would. Now if only Money would just collect that Pacquiao scalp. :!:
     
  7. Ilesey

    Ilesey ~ Full Member

    38,201
    2,600
    Jul 22, 2004
    Like Judah and Mosley....oh, wait
     
  8. Kampioni

    Kampioni Good Boy Full Member

    5,850
    10
    May 23, 2007
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
     
  9. Momus

    Momus Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,732
    2,571
    Nov 27, 2010
    I'm struggling to think of a single fight where Cotto looked like a definitively great fighter against quality opposition.

    Very good, solid, consistent all spring to mind when talking about him, but to me he is a prime example of how alphabet proliferation can inflate a fighter's resume. He was hyped as a future great from the early stages of his career, but his best wins are a razor thin decision over a 36 year old Mosley, and the redemption beatdown of a faded Margarito.

    You can make a HOF argument for him based on the sheer number of good fighters he beat, but the term "great" is thrown around way too easily in this era. Looking at the 80s and 90s welters, Curry and Starling would have taken him apart, and I think he'd struggle with Brown or Honeyghan.
     
  10. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    He's an over acheiver.
     
  11. boxingfanneato

    boxingfanneato what would MORALES do! Full Member

    2,850
    2
    Jan 2, 2010
    chop chol was a champ an lets not forget angel manfredy i would def. Add manfredy before ortiz. He has nice lil resume an if he woulda actually fought people that matter at 140 & early part of his welter career he wouldbt be hated as much as he is now. But his choice an thats why its tough to rank him high on anything buy a hth type match up
     
  12. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,568
    3,760
    May 4, 2012
    To be fair, Floyd would struggle with a lot of 80s and 90s welters as well.
     
  13. blackbolt396

    blackbolt396 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,146
    653
    Feb 13, 2012
    This is a great thread so here is a question rank Money Cotto Pacman and JMM.
     
  14. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,568
    3,760
    May 4, 2012
    Pac
    Mayweather
    Cotto
    Marquez

    :think
     
  15. blackbolt396

    blackbolt396 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,146
    653
    Feb 13, 2012
    Money Pacman Cotto and JMM