Miguel Cotto or Manny Pacquiao...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by puga_ni_nana, Apr 20, 2012.


  1. canucks9314

    canucks9314 Iron Chinned ATG Warrior Full Member

    11,933
    10
    Jun 21, 2011
    I agree with this.
     
  2. GOW7

    GOW7 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,285
    5
    Aug 16, 2010
    Cotto definitely losses this one guys. Considering how many primes you want to give Manny. Right now Manny is declining for the 2nd time so it's clear as day this guy wins this one.
     
  3. megavolt

    megavolt Constantly Shadowboxing Full Member

    13,622
    34
    Dec 25, 2009
    Some of you guys are having difficulty differentiating amount of wars vs total cumulative damage received
     
  4. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    well, shouldn't it be directly proportional?

    but this one is a little tricky since we all know that pac might have the more number of fights in a war but for the two fights that cotto was involved in them (margarito and pacquiao), he has basically absorbed more damage than what pac received in let's say 3 fights with marquez and 3 fights with morales?
     
  5. this_and_that

    this_and_that Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,697
    351
    Oct 13, 2010
    Of course Pac has been in more wars, but that doesn't mean he is farther removed from his prime.
    Cotto obviously is the one that has lost a step already.
    Pac's cramping is merely a sign of old age, poor habits and of course less time dedicated to the sport.
    But if you are a champ as he is, it shouldn't be an excuse.
    It especially doesn't give the right to tell all your excuses to the media.