Nothing was proven with Margarito. Lots of theories, no facts. Obviously, he was caught vs. Mosley, but that proves nothing vs. Cotto. In that case, if we're going to change decision because of innuendo, let's give Floyd a loss vs. Castillo, De La Hoya a loss vs. Strum, etc. etc. etc...
I'm talking about wraps that were supposedly used vs. Cotto. I'm not saying they weren't; I'm saying there's no proof. That's obviously convenient for him and his people, but it also goes both ways; should we take away a win for Cotto vs. Corley because of the early, hometown stoppage? It doesn't work that way. People can have opinions, but it doesn't change fact. Margarito W, Cotto L.
Cotto respectfully admitted that Pac is the better fighter and props to Cotto for taking the loss with his chin held high so move on, your opinion doesn't mean squat.
Nope, he has 2 losses. 1 from Marga - no proof, but was later caught trying to cheat. 1 from Pac - no proof, baseless accusations, better fighter that night.
you want to have a bet? if pac is tested positive i will ban myself. if he is clean even if it is random testing then never post in esb again. idiot.
If that is the case, Cotto would be the most unlucky fighter to ever lace them on!! But u gotta respect the man for takin the losses in his stride, specially the Pacman beat down. Either way Miguel has 2 losses on his ledger, simple as that
nope....he got fairly beat by pacquiao and this time....he is not asking for a rematch.... he also lost to margo...... a lost is a lost whichever way you look at it...