Miguel Cotto vs Oscar de la Hoya

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by tommyg6, Mar 19, 2016.


  1. Gannicus

    Gannicus 2014 Poster of the Year Full Member

    13,452
    2,990
    Mar 4, 2014
    Undoubtedly Oscar De La Hoya, by TKO 8. Oscar is just better than Cotto in every single way.
    Cotto was busy squeezing past wars against a 2007, past prime Mosley.
    De La Hoya on the other hand beat a 2003, roided Mosley.

    Just a little comment on 'levels', here.
     
  2. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    245,125
    240,490
    Nov 23, 2013
    Oscar wins by late KO. Cotto was never on De La Hoya's level.
     
  3. cslb

    cslb Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,648
    9,865
    Jan 27, 2014
    I agree with this. I don't care for Oscar either but I have to give him credit where credit is due.
     
  4. GolovKing

    GolovKing ESB Since 2006 Full Member

    2,235
    440
    Jul 18, 2013
  5. papolamuerte

    papolamuerte Yo soy La Muerte! Full Member

    3,257
    5
    Apr 21, 2008
    Interesting fight, if you ask me. Oscar wins regardless but interesting to say the least. At 140lb of course and both at their peaks
     
  6. RememberingC.S.

    RememberingC.S. Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,493
    89
    Oct 9, 2012
    Cotto would be pizzafaced yet again. If Trout could do it.
     
  7. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,394
    83,260
    Nov 30, 2006
    Yeah, there's a chance Oscar might be even better than Austin, you're right. :think
     
  8. JM22

    JM22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,487
    5
    Jun 5, 2008
    Fighters like Cotto are tailor made for DLH, DLH by late stoppage.