Mike McCallum vs Chris Eubank

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Xplosive, Jan 1, 2009.


  1. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,269
    9,845
    Jun 23, 2008
    At 160... who wins? I'll take McCallum by clear UD.
     
  2. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,217
    169
    Jul 23, 2004
    McCallum gets a very tough nights work here IMO. I'll take him on his workrate and postiveness through the contest. Eubank brings a very astute tactical gameplan to the table. He's got the movement and general awkwardness that McCallum wouldn't find to his taste. Eubank isn't predictable at all. While he's not as unpredictable as Grahman style wise, he did launch punches when an opponent was least expecting it. He would fight laterally around the perimeter of the ring, step forward, chin tucked down, and throw overhand rights. It was a punch that worked well for him throughout his career.

    Eubank wasn't a busy fighter. He could be at times, but not too often. His chin keeps him in this fight all the way. I don't see McCallum dropping him. It would also be a tall order for Eubank to do the same. I reckon the accuracy of McCallum does Eubank in the end. Better jab, slightly quick hands, and the more reliable workrate. Eubank could be clumsy when throwing punches, and he gets countered by McCallum due to it.
     
  3. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    90
    Nov 10, 2008
    agree with robbi a tough night but i think mccalum wins by UD although Eubank would win afew rounds i just think he would be countered quite alot and eubank didnt like body shots like benn did in the 1st fight although he recovered quickly they hurt him

    no KDs though
     
  4. Bad_Intentions

    Bad_Intentions Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,367
    30
    May 15, 2007
    Tough fight, McCallum SD.
     
  5. Sister Sledge

    Sister Sledge Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,129
    27
    Jul 24, 2004