Mike McCallum vs. Roy Jones Jr. at MW

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by kopejh, Jan 29, 2011.


  1. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    52
    Sep 8, 2007
    depends on the year. i'll be the first to say their fight at 175 should be completely discounted for these purposes

    a patient, technical counter puncher who destroyed the body at every opportunity against a physical phenom

    i see this going similar to the recent khan/maidana fight. jones dominates the first 6 rounds of the fight until mccallums early investment pays dividends. the second half is marked by mccallum landing the left hook more and more and jones potshotting from a distance, stealing rounds when he can

    mccallum closes the point gap and scores a knockdown along the way but jones pulls in through in the final round turning the fight back and going on the aggressive. his flurries give him the 12th round and the fight by SD
     
  2. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    91
    Nov 10, 2008
    Not entirely.

    McCallum briefly showed he had some success with the overhand right, I feel that plays a part.

    I also think Jones controll of the range and tempo, with his fast movement and pot shotting. Probably lets him take a close decision with McCallums counter-punching allowing it to be close.
     
  3. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    52
    Sep 8, 2007
    good point. someone like the body snatcher wouldn't rely entirely on one punch and the right could certainly play a factor
     
  4. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,146
    13,107
    Jan 4, 2008
    Roy wins a clear UD. He's just too fast. Even though McCallum is a superior ring general to the versions of Hopkins and Toney that Jones beat he's also physically inferior to them (in terms of speed and power). Jones' speed and unorthodoxy is just too much for him to deal with.
     
  5. Commando

    Commando Guest


    you think McCallum knocks Jones down?
     
  6. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    McCallum was ok. He was underrated when he was fighting and overrated now. He is in the middle of all that. The way he lost to Kalambay shows that Roy Jones would have easily outboxed him and nullified anything Mike could have done. Roy was better than all the guys who Mike beat.
     
  7. laxpdx

    laxpdx Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,921
    77
    Oct 1, 2006
    Yes, Jones wins a clear UD. Just too damn fast.
     
  8. Mr Butt

    Mr Butt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,678
    183
    May 16, 2009
    jones would move in and out to fast and his hand speed superiority would see him take a ud
     
  9. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    52
    Sep 8, 2007
    i do to be honest. i think at 160 McCallum would landing one of those sweeping left hooks after timing and frustrating jones. it may be a wider decision for jones than i give him credit for but with someone as technically brilliant and iron chinned as mccallum, i see roy getting frustrated at his inability to knock him out or cocky at his early dominance. either way, mccallum has his moments imo
     
  10. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    78
    Apr 4, 2010
  11. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,150
    Oct 22, 2006
    Stylistic nightmare for McCallum, Jones to win a comfort-ish decision.
     
  12. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Toney/Hopkins were actually faster than McCallum so McCallum despite his great timing and shot selection is at even more of a disadvantage here
     
  13. horst

    horst Guest

    I think you do a truly great fighter a real disservice here.

    Agreed. Jones's speed would just be too much, the difference in speed would be insane here.
     
  14. Sister Sledge

    Sister Sledge Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,129
    27
    Jul 24, 2004
    160 wasn't even McCallum's best weight.