Mike McCallum

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Haye, Dec 17, 2007.


  1. Haye

    Haye Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,928
    2
    Oct 11, 2007
    Dont know a lot about this dude. How good was he? What was his style?

    Basicly all I know is that he fought around MW and is considered a great name on anyone's record.
     
  2. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,958
    3,432
    Jun 30, 2005
    Excellent fighter. Better @ 154 than at 160.

    Very good technical skills, solid chin, terrific bodypuncher.

    He had the misfortune of being too much of a risk for too little reward, which happens to fighters time and time again over the years.

    He was the mandatory for Duran's WBA 154 lb. title in 1984, but Duran and Hearns in June of 1984. This led to a falling out between McCallum (a Kronk fighter) and Manny Steward, as McCallum was mad at Manny for having Hearns fight Duran when McCallum was supposed to get the title shot at Duran. Duran got stripped before the Hearns fight for not fighting McCallum, so only the WBC title was at stake when they fought.
     
  3. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,958
    3,432
    Jun 30, 2005
    Mike McCallum, similar to Archie Moore, has had a couple of birth dates listed. Moore has had both 1913 and 1916 listed, and McCallum has had both 1953 and 1956 listed.

    A similar thing happened with Marvin Hagler. The ESPN Sportscentury episode said he was really born in 1954 and lied as a kid and said 1952 to enter a tournament. It also happened again with George Foreman. I remember some things saying Jan 22, 1948, which would mean he beat Joe Frazier for the title on his 25th b-day and regained the title at 46, but most other reports have said Jan 10, 1949.
     
  4. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    122,871
    34,861
    Jun 23, 2005
    Norris-McCallum:think
     
  5. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    Gotten obliterated. Norris could not outbox him, and McCallum's chin was a litttle more than solid. Imagine Julian Jackson's surprise when he hit McCallum and he simply kept coming forward. And this is 154, not 160, where Jackson still hit hard, but not as hard.

    McCallum is arguably the greatest ever at 154, is vastly underrated and an ATG.
     
  6. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    122,871
    34,861
    Jun 23, 2005
    You really think it would be that bad huh? I see it a much closer fight almost a pick em.
     
  7. headhunter

    headhunter Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,592
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    McCallum was a f**king beast at 154 (ask Don Curry) and at 160 an ageing McCallum gave a prime James Toney all he could handle.He also went the distance with RJJ when he 40 years old.:bbb
     
  8. headhunter

    headhunter Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,592
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    McCallum would have beaten Norris pretty easy.
     
  9. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    I do....and I actually think Norris is one of the top 5 ever at LMW. McCallum was incredibly skilled, and a devastating body puncher. Norris was skilled as well, but he often had the power to keep people at bay. This wouldn't work on McCallum IMO, who simply continue to come forward and hit him to the body, and by the 8th round or so, I see McCallum stopping him.

    I don't do the A beats B so he beat C as well theory, but Jackson crushed Norris, and McCallum stopped him in 2. Also, McCallum stopped Curry, beat Steve Collins, Watson, and Herol Graham (Two of the three in the UK) and many think he beat Toney that first fight.
     
  10. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    McCallum vs Hearns would have been the fight to see (Duran would have been beaten if he had fought McCallum like he was supposed to). Too bad it never came off.
     
  11. headhunter

    headhunter Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,592
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    McCallum would Have beaten Hearns IMHO.
     
  12. surreal deal

    surreal deal Liverpool via Krypton Full Member

    7,396
    410
    Jun 16, 2006
    very smooth,relaxed,fluid style.natural fighter.
    if american, he'd have been a superstar/atg
     
  13. 196osh

    196osh Mendes Bros. Full Member

    14,565
    11
    May 10, 2007
    I dont think that actually. I think Tommy would have kept Mike on the end of his shots and knocked him mid to late.
     
  14. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    I don't think Hearns could stop McCallum.
     
  15. majinjohn

    majinjohn Member Full Member

    296
    1
    Oct 30, 2006
    He's one of the few people at 154 that stands a good chance at winning though.