Mike perez vs by by Jennings WHO YOU GOT AND WHY?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by at1, Jul 24, 2014.


  1. boxeo#1

    boxeo#1 Boxer-Puncher banned

    8,993
    1
    May 11, 2007
    News about fights.. ;)
     
  2. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,740
    13,117
    Apr 1, 2007
  3. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    249,013
    246,676
    Nov 23, 2013
    I'm not saying Jennings is that great either, but I think he may be a little better than Mike.
     
  4. Matt in a hat

    Matt in a hat Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,270
    7
    Nov 24, 2013
    You can see Perez's abs. He's not fat. His bodyfat % looks pretty low.
    12% at best. Perez has Tua-Tyson like tree trunk legs. He has been hitting some big time squats in the gym?
    I don' t think your getting legs that big doing road work.
     
  5. boxeo#1

    boxeo#1 Boxer-Puncher banned

    8,993
    1
    May 11, 2007
    Don't forget the most fat is actually around one's legs.

    Also, look at Perez' face. Good indicator. His one's about to explode.
     
  6. Matt in a hat

    Matt in a hat Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,270
    7
    Nov 24, 2013
    He's built like an Olympic weightlifter. You can see his quads, not fat.
     
  7. lepinthehood

    lepinthehood When I'm drinking you leave me well alone banned Full Member

    52,105
    23,332
    Aug 27, 2011
  8. MetalLicker

    MetalLicker I Am Full Member

    24,433
    28,363
    Feb 10, 2011
    My pick hasn't changed. I'm still picking Jennings by UD.

    Perez is not fat, but he's not in good fighting shape either.
     
  9. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,200
    28,091
    Jul 26, 2004
    **** it. Going back to Jennings by sd.
     
  10. boxeo#1

    boxeo#1 Boxer-Puncher banned

    8,993
    1
    May 11, 2007
    I didn't mean his legs are all fat. Not at all.
     
  11. MaliBua

    MaliBua Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,869
    348
    Jun 20, 2010
    Jennings UD. I wish Perez could pull the win but Im afraid he isnt the same after mago fight...
     
  12. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    30,450
    6,112
    Oct 5, 2009
    Hard one to call

    Did the Mago fight take that much out of Perez? He took the early rounds vs Takam and only looked bad when the body shots and pressure of a large and skilled fighter took over

    Jennings to me doesnt have the power or size to overwhelm Perez so he will have to do it with skill

    Not sure if he can do that

    close fight
     
  13. GGGunbeatable

    GGGunbeatable Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,136
    8,592
    Feb 14, 2014
    Perez just fought two months after the tough Mago fight against Takam, who is by far the better boxer than Jennings, while he wasn't the same as before. Still enough for a draw. Takam is really underrated here, he just schooled Thompson, the best US heavyweight.

    Perez is going to win easily. Jennings is not a boxer.
     
  14. ludwig

    ludwig Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,049
    59
    Apr 29, 2010
    Perez sure is short for a heavy--but not quite awkward short, like Tyson or Mchinu.

    Perez looks heavy at the weigh-in but I still lean towards him winning this fight. Could be that missing Abel Sanchez could set Perez back, but Adam Booth is also a good tactician.

    Jennings is still unproven imho (best win is vrs Spilzka, which proves very little) but if he gets a win here he's solid Top 10 no doubt.
     
  15. GGGunbeatable

    GGGunbeatable Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,136
    8,592
    Feb 14, 2014
    Szpilka wasn't Jennings best win. Fedosov and Tupou are way better than Szpilka and I think, he would also struggle with Liakhovich. Damn, that guy was down against David Saulsberry, twice! McCline broke his jaw, Mollo knocked him down twice and Minto lost through robbery .. Szpilka didn't even land a clear punch.