Mike Spinks v Gene Tunney (175&Heavy)

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Seamus, Jan 19, 2018.


  1. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    66,133
    53,519
    Feb 11, 2005
    You know the fighters. Match them at 175 and at Heavy.

    15 rounds (not 10) for each bout. Fairly permissive rules, tho neither were particularly dirty nor cut prone. 20 foot ring. Moon in its waning crescent.
     
  2. BlackCloud

    BlackCloud I detest the daily heavyweight threads Full Member

    3,200
    3,366
    Nov 22, 2012
    I think the moon would be crucial in this match, especially so if in its gibbous phase as we would be facing neap tides as opposed to spring, and this, i fear, would impact on Tunneys foot speed.
    I therefore favour Spinks.
     
  3. Combatesdeboxeo_

    Combatesdeboxeo_ Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,991
    1,141
    Nov 19, 2016
  4. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    17,164
    16,934
    Jun 9, 2007
    Tunney at both weights.
     
    PhillyPhan69 likes this.
  5. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,323
    15,911
    Dec 20, 2006
    Agreed
     
    robert ungurean likes this.
  6. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,901
    7,643
    Mar 17, 2010
  7. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    32,291
    40,391
    Jan 8, 2017
  8. ThatOne

    ThatOne Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,731
    9,231
    Jan 13, 2022
    Mike is "too much man, too much tan."