Mike 'The Bodysnatcher' Mccallum vs Saul 'Canelo' Alvarez

By saying a 35 year old MW was slightly faded?

 

We call fighters good all the time and don't mean them as a great fighter that would be a great fighter regardless of era. We don't call them excellent and mean the same thing.

Yeah you're an annoying douche.

I'm not surprised. I wouldn't either if I thought Kalambay was a better technician than Ray Robsinson.

I've spent enough time training with boxers, mma fighters, and grapplers to know a thing or two about fighting. I've trained under coaches that get their fighters into the UFC and with Mayweather promotions. There's no lack of knowledge on the fundamentals of boxing here and I'm more than comfortable with the idea that there's absolutely nothing new you could teach me in that regard. Especially since you consider Kalambay a better technician than Ray Robinson, a heralded ring technician and the p4p greatest fighter to ever live.

Go for it bro.

 

Try not to go to sleep. You might miss the next 20 years of boxing again.

 

WHy do I have to keep catching you in these lies? You must really enjoy putting your foot in your mouth.

 

Like someone previously stated, if you think Canelo hasn't improved ten-fold since he lost to Mayweather then you really don't know anything about Canelo. You really need to watch these fights, you sound incredibly ignorant and it's doing a huge disservice.

GGG wasn't faded in any sense of the word. He just beat the other best middleweight in the world.

More nonsense. You ramble like some loon from One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest.

 

This is what you’ve now been reduced to.

You’ve got nothing left.

 

Shall I highlight all of your posts where you’ve said that I called those guys GREAT when I didn’t?

Faded, slightly faded.

What difference does it make?

The guy who you’re claiming to be better than Mike and who apparently has great versatility, couldn’t beat a faded 35 year old MW.

Yet when Mike was 35 himself, he’s was giving James Toney all he could handle.

 

Of course he’s improved since the Floyd fight.

Yes, he was faded.

If you want to say slightly faded, that’s fine.

More nonsense?

It’s YOU who made bold claims which you haven’t been able to back up.

 

Sure thing bro.

 

I literally told you he beat the best middleweight in the world behind him prior to Canelo. You're a clown who doesn't know a thing about modern boxing.

 

Excellent or great the words are synonymous. With everything else you had to say about Kalambay you all but said it.

Mike McCallum wouldn't beat GGG so your point is completely lost.

 

Yeah.

I can only hope and pray that one day I become as knowledgeable as you.

 

Mike wouldn’t have had a chance against GG.

You’re quite right.

GG was LEVELS above Mike.

I’m going to watch the Geale fight later.

It reminds me of Hagler-Hearns.

 

Nice

 

Atta boy