Mike Tyson in the 70s

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by MixedMartialLaw, Sep 6, 2024.


  1. The Undefeated Lachbuster

    The Undefeated Lachbuster On the Italian agenda Full Member

    4,900
    7,574
    Jul 18, 2018
    would be smaller due to the lack of hgh and having to rely moreso on dianabol rather than better anabolic compounds, maybe about 200lbs. I think he'd be a good fighter and would probably have a brutal war with frazier in which frazier hits the deck but stops Tyson late due to his stamina issues. Although perhaps with 20lbs less, he wouldnt have the same stamina issues. Still picking Frazier there. For what its worth, i think Tyson would do better into Foreman due to having better defense. He has the potential to outright stop Frazier as well. Ali is a bit awkward. Could definitely see him winning over 10 or 12.
     
  2. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    19,080
    20,568
    Jul 30, 2014
    lol are you unable to refute their arguments by yourself?
     
  3. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 MONZON VS HAGLER 2025 banned Full Member

    19,057
    21,102
    Sep 22, 2021
    You think that HGH is primary driver of mass in PEDs? It really isn’t, Juice heads don’t typically even touch the stuff. Dbol has been around for a long time, it was the answer to the Soviets using T whatever Cus was giving Mike in the 80s he could give him in the 70s.
     
    Smoochie likes this.
  4. MixedMartialLaw

    MixedMartialLaw Combat sports enthusiast Full Member

    1,746
    2,803
    Jun 30, 2021
    Also Mike was about 200 lbs as a 12 year old. He was 230+ between fights and would trim down to his 215-220 lbs fight weight throughout his camps. Mike wasn't someone who'd ever struggle getting over 200 lbs.
     
    Smoochie likes this.
  5. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,288
    11,742
    Sep 21, 2017
    I think I made a thread a long time ago about how Tyson would stop Foreman. I just don't feel like rehashing it
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.
  6. Smoochie

    Smoochie G.R.E.B G.O.A.T Full Member

    1,803
    1,902
    May 16, 2024
    Might be in a minority but I don't think pre-prison Tyson used Peds and it was more like a case of a 1:100000 genetic, physical freak.
     
    Jakub79 likes this.
  7. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    29,622
    36,199
    Jan 8, 2017
    Now this sounds good. Wish Tyson had been around back then really.
     
  8. Jakub79

    Jakub79 Active Member Full Member

    1,004
    1,118
    Mar 3, 2024
    It is always the case that an individual is equal to a group, not the other way around. The perfect example is Wlad who over the years has shaped the ideal style based on distance control and grab and jab style, more was not needed. It was impossible to do it with Fury, but Wlad was capable of more, so much so that he forgot these skills, did not shape them. Not in a fight. And he could do more. Wlad in the 90s would have been much better and would have gained greater recognition. I think that Tyson competing with Ali, Foreman and Frazier would also be better than competing with Bruno, Douglas, Ruddock, just as he was better competing with Spinks, Biggs and Holmes
     
  9. Smoochie

    Smoochie G.R.E.B G.O.A.T Full Member

    1,803
    1,902
    May 16, 2024
    Bob Foster? lmao
    I wonder who would have been his Douglas, maybe he will never meet someone like that since he could lose to Foreman/Alì in their respective primes.
     
  10. The Undefeated Lachbuster

    The Undefeated Lachbuster On the Italian agenda Full Member

    4,900
    7,574
    Jul 18, 2018
    Every single top athlete in the 80s til now was on performance enhancing drugs; even a genetic freak would not be able to achieve Tyson's athleticism while training as a boxer. He was the right combination of freak genetics, training and drugs, as is every world class athlete. The drug testing in the 80s and 90s was a joke, and PEDs still very commonly slip through nowadays despite advancements because drug testing simply cannot keep up with new drugs.
     
  11. Spreadeagle

    Spreadeagle Active Member Full Member

    1,233
    1,552
    Feb 24, 2023
    Agreed.