MIKE TYSON (prime) Vs. JOE FRAZIER (prime)

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by RJJFAN5, May 17, 2008.


  1. RJJFAN5

    RJJFAN5 New Member Full Member

    22
    0
    May 14, 2008
    Who would be victorious ??
     
  2. Dunks

    Dunks Absolute Grandmaster Full Member

    7,771
    0
    Jan 5, 2008
    Frazier KO...not sure what ROUND....we saw what Mike Tyson was made of when Buster Douglas hit him back...Fraziers Left HOOKS would be the difference IMO..Tyson is no Foreman
     
  3. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    Tyson by KO, for sure.
     
  4. TheGreat

    TheGreat Boxing Junkie banned

    13,028
    14
    Jan 12, 2005
    Tyson by KO, Frazier's stlye would play into Tyson's strengths IMO.
     
  5. nezy37

    nezy37 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,241
    0
    Jul 13, 2007
    I would pick Tyson by KO in the middle rounds but as Dunks said how would Tyson hold up to a fighter like Frazier hitting him back
     
  6. blood_lust

    blood_lust Active Member Full Member

    856
    1
    Dec 12, 2007
    That's right....Tyson was better than Foreman. Tyson would of destroyed Frazier. More speed, power, technique, and tenacity. The Douglas fight is a bad example, as he was already famous and disillusioned with boxing. Fight would be all wrong for Frazier.
     
  7. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    Ruddock hit harder than Frazier, and that was a past prime Tyson that took him out twice. Tyson had no problem taking a hit, at any point in his career other than in the past few years. When discussing mythical matchups involving Tyson, I assume we're taking the prime 86-88 version.
     
  8. ralphc

    ralphc Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,352
    0
    Jan 11, 2007
    Tyson couldn't handle opponents who weren't afraid of him. Frazier wasn't scared of anybody. It is just a question of time before Frazier knocks him out.
     
  9. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    Yeah, we also know that Hagler was a brawler. We know that Whitaker was a runner. We know that Duran was a quitter. We know that the world is flat, etc.
     
  10. nezy37

    nezy37 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,241
    0
    Jul 13, 2007
    Yeah you're probably right. I would suspect that that Frazier would be really vaulnerable to a devastating Tyson uppercut
     
  11. Dunks

    Dunks Absolute Grandmaster Full Member

    7,771
    0
    Jan 5, 2008
    Tyson was stronger than Foreman?:huh .....and the Douglas fight is a perfect example because finally Tyson was matched against someone who would hit him back and who could BOX....and Douglas was No FRAZIER!!!
     
  12. Dunks

    Dunks Absolute Grandmaster Full Member

    7,771
    0
    Jan 5, 2008
    Watch the Douglas fight AGAIN
     
  13. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    So Tyson was never once hit back in his entire career up until the Douglas fight?

    Tucker(you know, the one that TKO'd Douglas) Biggs, Thomas, Holmes, Spinks, and Williams couldn't box?

    True, Douglas was no Frazier, they fought absolutely nothing at all alike, so why are you comparing them?
     
  14. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    Why? What on earth does that have to do with a prime Tyson vs Joe Frazier?
     
  15. Samurai

    Samurai I lost an avatar bet Full Member

    3,634
    4
    Mar 30, 2008