Mike Tyson - The Hardest puncher in History

Please to remind me the top rated heavyweights that Shavers and Wilder KOd

 

Yeah cos everyone could see that was the same douglas

 

please tell me how you know.

 

The kayo percentage as we all know is a shaky guide at best.
Its who you kayo that's important. Frank Bruno couldn't do it at the highest level and theres no evidence that klitchko can although I like him hes a classy guy. To be called the hardest puncher in boxing history you have to prove it against the best.
Any fool can kayo a tomato can, only great punchers can kayo the best.

 

Err Jimmy Young, Jimmy Ellis, Roy Williams, Ken Norton, Jeff Sims, Malik Scott just to name a few...

 

Please tell me how you know...

 

Oh no Tokyo Douglas's chin was much better in Tokyo than it was against Holyfield.....

 

And I'm telling you that this simply can't be done with any degree of precision. Is Foreman's KO comp better than Tyson's? Is Tyson's better than Lewis's, is Lewis's better than Louis's?

What does the best mean?

Better boxers, better chins? Better careers, better title defenses?

 

I actually agree, the question of who's the hardest hitter in boxing history is a stupid question. Or at least unanswerable. Same thing really. Were all agreed theres no way to even measure it.
All we can ask is who scored kayos/hurt/wobbled etc most consistently against world class, proven opposition?

 

Well if that's the case then the champions with the highest knockout percentage are the crème de la crème.

 

you've failed to understand again. KO Percentages don't include the level of opposition.

 

It does when they are world champion, nobody gets a title shot if they are a tomato can...

 

Yeah so were his condition and desire

 

what world do you live in?
Klitchko alone has made a living proving you wrong

 

They only look bad because he makes them look bad.