Mike Tyson: Top 10 Heavyweight?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Hands of Iron, Aug 20, 2012.


  1. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,554
    3,755
    May 4, 2012
    ffs :rofl
     
  2. Hands of Iron

    Hands of Iron #MSE Full Member

    14,701
    16
    Feb 23, 2012
    :rofl :rofl

    He updated it July 2012 though.

     
  3. Hands of Iron

    Hands of Iron #MSE Full Member

    14,701
    16
    Feb 23, 2012
    The old list:

    :happy
     
  4. Axe

    Axe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,013
    3
    Jan 23, 2005
    Borderline case IMO. Can really be argued either way.
     
  5. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,537
    16,006
    Jul 19, 2004
    Agreed. I'd have him between 12-15 myself, but never had a problem with someone saying he's top 10. A strong enough case can certainly be made.
     
  6. banny

    banny Active Member Full Member

    1,418
    0
    Jan 22, 2010
    This content is protected
     
  7. banny

    banny Active Member Full Member

    1,418
    0
    Jan 22, 2010
    This content is protected
     
  8. whopperdong

    whopperdong "sorry dan, im the man" Full Member

    4,269
    139
    Jul 10, 2011
    If ppl say no cause Tyson didn't have enought atg on his res then how the hell does either klichsko make it.
     
  9. Hands of Iron

    Hands of Iron #MSE Full Member

    14,701
    16
    Feb 23, 2012
  10. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,554
    3,755
    May 4, 2012
    They can't make it either. :good
     
  11. devon

    devon Guest

    Same with Holmes and Dempsey people have to look past some fighters resume and look at their skills more.
     
  12. Webbiano

    Webbiano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,588
    2,494
    Nov 6, 2011
    That's an incredibly weak argument. Wlad has a much better reign than Tyson has and arguably hit harder, with a better KO percentage. Not too mention Wlad's longevity. Tyson was apparently shot at 22. People have different criterias bro, so if someone doesn't take H2H into account then Tyson doesn't stack up that well against some heavyweights.

    Tyson's at 10 on my list, with Wlad around 13. I can't see my self ever having Wlad above Tyson, but it's certianly not out of the question to have Wlad over Tyson.
     
  13. The Mangler

    The Mangler Active Member Full Member

    788
    0
    Aug 16, 2012
    I don't think he lasted long enuf on top to be rated in the top 10. He kicked everybody's asses while he was there, but fell off before he could get his next defining test against Holy.

    Then when he came back, even tho he took back 2 of the belts, he got smoked by Holy when Holy was even more past it than he was. And he never really did **** after that.
     
  14. ecdrm15

    ecdrm15 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,274
    98
    Apr 30, 2008
    80's Tyson (D'amato/Rooney) yes!
     
  15. Punisher73

    Punisher73 Member Full Member

    263
    15
    Nov 24, 2009
    Easy, after he did all that you said, he sucked to finish out his career. If he would have retired after fighting Seldon and Bruno and getting the WBA/WBC titles back. He would be in the Top 10 list. After Seldon he lost the next 2 fights to Holyfield and finished out his career with a 5-5-2 record.