Mike Tyson v Corrie Sanders

Sanders STILL snaps Douglas' jaw in half

 

Wow, 10 idiots (all Kilt fanboys) voted for Sanders

These morons need a lobotomy.

 

ive posed two questions to these klit****s and no one has been able to answer either question.

Name me the southpaws Tyson supposedly ducked.

And b, outside of Wlad, name me ONE world class fighter Sanders actually beat, because as it stands, Sanders is a complete one hit wonder.

Outside of Wlad, all Sanders beat was Michael Sprott and Bobby Czyz. Sanders was a completely irrelevant nobody.

 

Tyson had a good chin and only got stopped due to an accumulation of shots, he's also one of the biggest hitters of all time. Sanders on the other hand had a not so great chin, terrible stamina an isn't even the mythical huge puncher that the Wlad fans make him out to be , he could even KO Rahman despite landing his best shots on him ffs.

 

Dealing with facts and logic is something they struggle with. For example, according to them, Lewis not facing the LOSER of Rahman vs Sanders = Lewis ducking Sanders

 

sanders wouldn't have got mentioned if we currently didn't have such a loser of a world champ at hw that he picks dedbeats to defend against because his fans don't care who he fights.

Sanders, a man who when prime did nothing, now faded into 37/38 year old fatboy retirement, picked for the HW title..... only in the K bro era does this happen.

its a wonder klit fans don't hang their heads in shame when his name is mentioned, so poor was this defence choice..but then wlad had to go and LOSE in seconds to him... which means the fans have to invent some bizarre mythology regarding the 38 year old nobody to explain the loss

 

and that's why we call them klit****s.

But its down on paper, outside of his one night stand with Wlad, Sanders beat NOBODY of note.

Sanders pretty much lost everytime he stepped up, apart from that one night where he struck it lucky.

Brewster also beat Wlad, do we make him into a legend? No. Brewster lost to Etienne a few years prior, yes that same Etienne Tyson demolished in one round.

Purrity also beat Wlad, do we make him a legend? No, Purrity had 12 losses at the time of facing Wlad.

Sanders was just the right guy in the right place at the right time, other than that he was NOTHING special. His career and body of work attest to this.

 

Douglas breaks Sanders down, takes him late and knocks him out while Sanders is still trying to catch his breath.

 

Because fans seem to think the transition to fight southpaws is as simple as flicking a light switch.

It's not. That is why its harder for them to land big fights compared to orthodox heavyweights. It's better than it was, at least.

Maybe Tyson is dynamite against southpaws. Maybe he'd struggle.

My original post stands: it's impossible to know or even guess accurately.

Any guess on this thread has to come from other biases and preferences with no track record in reality.

 

Brewster and purity are not white, that's why they don't get the corrie treatment from some klitaards.

 

Sanders being a southpaw is irreverent anyway since the guy fought square on and no defence.

Tyson beats him one sided because Sanders was easily beatable. Nothing else.
K****s will go to any length to make excuses for Wlads loses. Shower of morons.

 

you rarely see punchers struggle with southpaws, its straight up conventional boxers that have that problem.

Frank Bruno turned southpaw for the second Tyson fight to which the commentators replied he would get hammered even worse and he did.

As i mentioned before, Tyson had the ability to knock people out with either hand, being southpaw wouldnt mean ****, except that you'd be more vulnerable to Tysons best punch, his left hook.

the only active southpaw in Tysons time was Moorer, a guy Tyson would have demolished very early.

 

Make a poll kevin mcbride ,danny williams or buster douglas vs Wlad.

 

You're a biggest moron on This forum

 

I'l shut you out:good