Mike Tyson vs David Tua - Fight That Never Happened

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mark ant, Nov 19, 2019.


  1. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,558
    May 4, 2017
    Could Tua have beat Tyson if they had of met? was Tyson too far gone by that time? I feel Tyson was highly beatable by that stage and Tua hasd the power to knock him out.
    This content is protected
     
  2. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,250
    9,812
    Jun 23, 2008
    Tua beats Tyson anytime after 96. By the late 90s, Mike was reduced to a 5-round fighter.

    Prime Tyson wipes his ass with Tua.
     
  3. joebeadg

    joebeadg Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,909
    1,016
    Dec 3, 2005
    Tyson was too far gone by that time??? What time? Anyways, although Tua could punch, I think Mike at his worst, and suffering from the flu, could still beat Tua
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.
  4. destruction

    destruction Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,599
    13,142
    Mar 26, 2009
    Before the Bruno or Holyfield fights and I would have favoured Mike to win a decision. The Holyfield losses broke Tysons heart and after that his preparation and fitness was never the same again.

    After the Holyfield fights and Tua becomes more of a favourite with every year that passes. By 1999/2000 I would make Tua a strong favourite to get the KO victory.
     
    Fergy and Saad54 like this.
  5. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,558
    May 4, 2017
    Tyson began to fade as soon as Rooney left his team.
     
    Oddone likes this.
  6. Twisted_Metal

    Twisted_Metal Active Member Full Member

    972
    130
    Mar 4, 2008
    Tua is never close to prime Mike level. Tyson that fought Bruno and Holyfield in mid 90s would still beat Tua. Tua isnt capable of throwing those rapidfire combo that Mike threw to finished off Bruno in their second bout.

    Also, Tyson actually looked good against Golota and Savarese. I dont see Tua destroying Golota's whole body the way Mike did within 2 rounds.
     
  7. Boxing2019

    Boxing2019 If you want peace, prepare war. banned Full Member

    7,175
    5,448
    Jul 22, 2019
    Prime Tyson would knock Tua out within 5 rounds cause he tore down guys much taller and heavier than him..second Tyson would lose for KO after the 5th imo. Tua win with second Tyson for decision wouldnt be surprising.
     
  8. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,819
    6,568
    Dec 10, 2014
    Prime for Prime Tyson is the easy winner.

    If they had fought before Tyson/Holyfield, I'll go with Tyson. Mike was faded from his prime but Tua did not have a lot of experience yet.

    If they had fought any time after Holyfield/Tyson II, I have to pick Tua to beat Tyson.
     
    Xplosive likes this.
  9. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,819
    6,568
    Dec 10, 2014
    I don't think so.

    After the second Holyfield fight, all Tyson had left was power, and Tua had a great chin.

    Tua's speed and power would make a gassed Mike quit at some point.
     
    Richard M Murrieta and mark ant like this.
  10. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,558
    May 4, 2017
    I feel Tua would knocked out Bruno and Golota.
     
  11. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    15,884
    11,432
    Sep 21, 2017
    Prime Tyson beats the brakes off of Tua.
     
    mark ant and Golden_Feather99 like this.
  12. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,558
    May 4, 2017
    Tua wasn`t a pro when Tyson was in his prime.
     
  13. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    15,884
    11,432
    Sep 21, 2017
    I'm just saying in a hypothetical match up
     
  14. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,558
    May 4, 2017
    Okay, I thought you misunderstood my thread.