Mike Tyson vs George Foreman in 1995

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by steve1990, Nov 9, 2021.


Who takes this and how

  1. Tyson by KO

    24.2%
  2. Tyson by Decision

    30.3%
  3. Foreman by KO

    45.5%
  4. Foreman by Decision

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  5. Draw

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    24,897
    15,673
    Apr 3, 2012
    Those Savarese fights.
     
  2. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    51,363
    41,280
    Apr 27, 2005
    But what if Sloopy hang on hang on till Mike was tired?

    This content is protected
     
  3. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    51,363
    41,280
    Apr 27, 2005

    This content is protected
     
  4. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,051
    11,206
    Mar 19, 2012
    Pinky Thomas!!
     
    moneytheman12 likes this.
  5. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,051
    11,206
    Mar 19, 2012
    Right and unlike Ruddock Foreman knew how to fight. George would tame him with the jab. That bigjab is gonna rock Tyson to his heels when he feels it
     
  6. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,051
    11,206
    Mar 19, 2012
    Alex Stewart figbt too. Took Holyfiedl the distance. Tyson blew him out.
    How did Tyson Holyfield go?
     
  7. moneytheman12

    moneytheman12 Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,780
    878
    Feb 4, 2021
    wrong and switched around that razor was older didnt fight that good George was sloopy and slow
    razor when young wasnt sloopy and moved better then young George ever did and threw better angled punches

    mike never was tamed by a slow sloopy puncher dumb thing to say never was beat by one ether
     
  8. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    24,897
    15,673
    Apr 3, 2012
    If you possessed my intellect, you'd know that Savarese is the only common opponent if these two after 95.
     
  9. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,556
    9,825
    Mar 7, 2012
    What’s your point?

    How is it relevant?
     
  10. Barrf

    Barrf Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,266
    6,404
    Sep 19, 2021
    Tyson ate bomb after bomb from Ruddock, and it didn't do much other than **** him off. It took 8 rounds of a one-sided mauling by Lewis to get him out of there. It took 10 rounds of being ground down by Douglas to get him out of there. It took 11 rounds of Holyfield grinding him down to get him out of there.

    Mike was very, very durable. Landing a few big shots was not going to take him out. I don't see anybody stopping him in 3-4 rounds. Even if George did take him out, it wouldn't be quick.
     
    rinsj and moneytheman12 like this.
  11. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,308
    9,070
    Jun 9, 2010
    ...that having a vague understanding of chronology (at least, in years) makes him schmart?
     
  12. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,308
    9,070
    Jun 9, 2010
    :loel:
     
  13. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    51,363
    41,280
    Apr 27, 2005
    We need more @Eddie Ezzard on this forum!!!!
     
    Man_Machine likes this.
  14. moneytheman12

    moneytheman12 Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,780
    878
    Feb 4, 2021
    right and crazy idiots been repeating that dumb quote for years oh George would do it when it's no proof of mike ever looking close to being dropped so no he wouldnt

    that dude knows im right thats why he trolled saying the bull he said

    George was almost dropped in the 1st round with ron he was hurt bad from the 1st strong right

    mike was way tougher then young George ever was for taking damage

    jim and ali had George stunned from single shots even before falling

    mike took mutiple loaded up shots from razor like you said who was known to hit hard

    mike would destroy George I already gave the breakdown which wasnt debunked by anything that can be shown on video and never will

    George wouldn't touch mike often shown by smith like I said who was a close range slugger who did punch faster then George and with better tech

    why would a slow slow sloopy George land more doesn't add up

    pushing mike wouldnt do good put mike back where he fought best at and think that helps him hit mike no it gives mike chances to see everything that's coming at him idiots
     
    Last edited: Nov 16, 2021
  15. Eddie Ezzard

    Eddie Ezzard Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,447
    5,123
    Jan 19, 2016
    You called...?