Mike Tyson Vs. George Foreman

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by la-califa, Jun 29, 2007.


  1. la-califa

    la-califa Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,292
    53
    Jun 12, 2007
    Alot of people are debating Tyson is a better fighter than Frazier. Could he have withstood the onslaught of a prime rampaging Foreman any better than Frazier?
     
  2. Sizzle

    Sizzle Active Member Full Member

    1,293
    21
    Mar 4, 2006
    Yes. Much better chin and defense.
     
    moneytheman12 likes this.
  3. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    Yes, Tyson and Frazier are quite different fighters. Frazier was a swarmer, Tyson a puncher.
    Some key differences between them:

    -Tyson is probably the harder hitter punch for punch
    -Tyson has less predictable head movement but was less consistent with it
    -Tyson started extremely fast whereas Frazier needed rounds to get smoking
    -Frazier has far better stamina and usually broke him opponents down untill they couldn't give anymore. Tyson usually finished his opponents with one or more combinations or even one punch. The only time he broke his opponent down was Biggs, but he was never really in the fight.
    -Frazier was the better infighter whereas Tyson usually took a rest on the inside.
    -Tyson had knockout power in both hands whereas Frazier relied mostly on the left hook. Also, Frazier didn't use the uppercut as often as Tyson seemed to. Tyson had better combinations.

    Because of these differences in style, i think Tyson would do much better against Foreman because he's just as deadly early on as Foreman is. His head movement is also a bit less predictable early on and he has better quick combinations. That said, i still favor Foreman to beat Tyson, but Tyson has a decent to good chance of winning.
     
  4. My dinner with Conteh

    My dinner with Conteh Tending Bepi Ros' grave again Full Member

    12,059
    3,562
    Dec 18, 2004

    Excellent post. :bbb
     
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,783
    29,185
    Jun 2, 2006
    Good post ,Isee George winning early say ko 3rds,but Tyson would be dangerous all the time,he had more tools than Frazierbut wasnt as effective inside,his hand speed and two fisted power make him a risk for anyone imo.
     
  6. My dinner with Conteh

    My dinner with Conteh Tending Bepi Ros' grave again Full Member

    12,059
    3,562
    Dec 18, 2004
    I think it'd last around 6. Tyson has a chance of a late stoppage if he doesn't trade. But I think he will, his solid chin would take him to the middle rounds.
     
    Stevie G likes this.
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,094
    48,302
    Mar 21, 2007
    I don't see why Tyson couldn't knock Foreman out.

    His punching is a bit sharper and his combo puncing is crackling. If Tyson is the first to score big (good chance), I think he could finish his man.

    I personally would make Tyson the favourite here.
     
    moneytheman12, Sangria and ETM like this.
  8. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    53,018
    44,951
    Apr 27, 2005
    D'Amato told Tyson no fighter of his style in history would beat Foreman and i tend to agree. Foreman by stoppage around the time dinner says.
     
  9. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Whoever forces the other back and whoever gets their shots off first (ie beats the opponent to the punch) wins. Could be a real back and forth fight
     
  10. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,775
    312
    Dec 12, 2005
    Tyson has glaring disadvantages that would make it a fairly easy stompage win. Foreman was too strong and would force Tyson backwards without even having to think strategically like Holyfield did. If Foreman is allowed to shove Tyson like he did Frazier, then Tyson will be at a further disadvantage.

    Tyson does hit harder than Frazier, has a greater repertoire of punches, starts more explosively and has less predictable head movement... but it wouldn't really make much of a difference. Foreman's early rush was overwhelming and Tyson would have no chance outside of puncher's chance.

    I see Tyson slipping the telephone polls that Foreman will throw and stepping closer at an angle to land nice shots to Foreman's sides. Foreman will not wilt under this and will instead manhandle Tyson -by shoving him off balance and coming inexorably in behind monster shots.
    Tyson was durable, yes, but he was not resilient (physically or emotionally). Once hurt, I don't remember him ever fully recovering to win. Douglas and Holyfield proved this. His effectiveness plummeted although he was still dangerous. Against Holyfield, he couldn't remember anything after about the 3rd round. Foreman would make it so he couldn't remember anything after that 1st minute of the first round.

    If Tyson were bigger and were not so reliant on forward motion, he'd have more of a chance. But considering Foreman's iron chin, physical strength, and power, Tyson wouldn't hear the 9th round bell... and that only because he was durable.
     
    Abysswalker likes this.
  11. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    16,343
    15,445
    Jun 9, 2007
  12. Bad_Intentions

    Bad_Intentions Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,367
    31
    May 15, 2007
    i agree too. no way in hell would tyson beat a prime foreman. 1 punch from foreman would leave tyson wobbly, and thats where foreman attacks with those combinations that he landed to frazier, tyson will be KO'd.
     
  13. MoneyPunch

    MoneyPunch New Member Full Member

    56
    2
    Jan 13, 2007
    You lot are deluded.
    Foreman was beaten to the punch easily every time by a faded Ali, and so Tysons lightning fast hand speed and foot speed is a nightmare for Foreman.
    Tyson would stop Foreman, make, no mistake about that.
     
    moneytheman12 likes this.
  14. My dinner with Conteh

    My dinner with Conteh Tending Bepi Ros' grave again Full Member

    12,059
    3,562
    Dec 18, 2004



    I see Amateur Hour has started.
     
  15. Sizzle

    Sizzle Active Member Full Member

    1,293
    21
    Mar 4, 2006
    Source?

    I find that a horribly sweeping sort of statement to make by a topclass trainer.