Mike Tyson vs. George Foreman

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by teeto, Jun 6, 2008.


  1. jones1

    jones1 Active Member Full Member

    834
    0
    Sep 30, 2007
    Something else to consider in a matchup like this would be Tyson's mental state: Cus obviously tried to make Tyson replicate Frazier's style. Thus he probably warned Mike about fighting someone like Foreman. I think Mike's style was superior to Frazier's with simple things such as he didn't lead with his head and could put you down with either hand. So in conclusion to all of this I think that Foreman would knock Tyson out on the count of Mike would have no confidence against him and with someone like Mike he would need that confidence to make a fight out of it. He would have been defeated before he ever stepped in the ring and probably would never have even accepted the fight. I think an easily discouraged and fearful Mike gets taken out within the first four rounds. Now you could flip flop the situation and say that if somehow Mike went into this fight with confidence and a set mindframe, I believe he would knock out Foreman somewhere around the 6th round.
    Either way it would be a hell of a fight.
     
  2. Blacc Jesus

    Blacc Jesus . Full Member

    1,495
    23
    Aug 30, 2007
    Who takes a fight between Tyson/Foreman in '91?
     
  3. Bing

    Bing Active Member Full Member

    668
    4
    Jul 14, 2007
    Think Tyson would win. Foreman wasn't as fast as in his prime and wouldn't have the offense to keep mike off. Tyson would be landing at will and when Tysons hitting you at will.... well you know the rest
     
  4. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    I see we do!!!
     
  5. Chinxkid

    Chinxkid Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,096
    4
    Apr 28, 2008
    Great take! Mike's mental state up until he climbs into the ring could be #1 factor here; which Tyson shows up that night, the stone killer or the little boy?
     
  6. jones1

    jones1 Active Member Full Member

    834
    0
    Sep 30, 2007
    what? frazier isnt the heavyweight that tyson was compared to the most? tyson didnt have the same swarming style with head movement to get him inside? if not frazier then who else?
     
  7. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    I get you, but if you read my initial post (the thread), i have outlined some of their differences. The style maybe similar, but Tyson used much more footwork to his advantage to open guys up, whereas Frazier really was a swarmer who relied on his big left.
     
  8. jones1

    jones1 Active Member Full Member

    834
    0
    Sep 30, 2007
    true and Tyson didnt have Frazier's biggest flaw which imo was leading with his head. I was just saying that I thought that Cus used Frazier as something to look up to while training Tyson if you know what I mean.
     
  9. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    Yea, much better technically Tyson was, i get you though
     
  10. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    I was gunna say Tyson is more Patterson than Frazier, didnt wanna get argumentative though!!!
     
  11. radianttwilight

    radianttwilight Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,539
    18
    May 5, 2007
    Tyson was a shorter, beefier version of Floyd Patterson.

    When you think about it it's really obvious.
     
  12. jones1

    jones1 Active Member Full Member

    834
    0
    Sep 30, 2007
    Oh my bad :patsch , I just assumed because of all the similarities between Tyson and Frazier. But I didnt really mean to stress that as much as I thought that Cus would have told Tyson that someone with Foreman's style would be his cryptonite. Like it would have hurt his confidence to be fighting Foreman, a puncher who has the potential to keep mike off him if he can land on him.
     
  13. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,047
    Oct 25, 2006
    We've had this matchup many, many times and each time I've picked Tyson.

    The thing for me is this:

    In his heyday, Tyson was disciplined. George never was. George was reckless and extremely wild at times. His defence was also sorely lacking, consisting of throwing his arms up in the air to deflect punches, which is barely a defence at all. He also wound up his punches like a barroom brawler.
    He is going to be there to be hit all day since Tyson brings handspeed vastly superior into the ring and will exploit those technical deficiences.
     
  14. ironchamp

    ironchamp Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,365
    1,034
    Sep 5, 2004
    Tyson,

    Better handspeed, better stamina, better chin and techinically more proficient.

    George will have problems establishing himself. He'll land a big shot or two but not nearly enough to change the tide nor will it be enough to keep Tyson off him. Foreman's inability to keep Tyson from landing is why I lean towards Mike.

    Tyson TKO5
     
  15. markedwardscott

    markedwardscott Active Member Full Member

    1,165
    4
    Apr 6, 2007
    Great match. I think Tyson catches an uppercut and gets kayoed.