yes i do. cain did have a shot nog, a mediocre kongo and a clueless lesnar and he in a of a better word "put a ***** in her place" he got thrue them with ease which mir didnt and infact lost to brock "doing a 720 when taking a punch" lesnar. if he had a good striking game why didnt he dispose of lesnar?
he also underestimated the improvements brock had made on the ground. when brock shut down his half guard it took him completely by surprise. ive always said mir would win a rubber match and really hope we get to see one.
carwin is more technical he throws hooks, jabs and viscous uppercuts and his boxing is way ****ing better than mir's anyway if mir was better at striking how come he lost to shane carwin?
dude seriously if mir is such a 'technical" expert striker how come he got ****ed up against shane carwin?
Once again he came in with the wrong gameplan. He tried to match strength with strength and you don't do that with Carwin. Especially in the clinch.
Nonsense. Mir is a far more technical striker than Carwin. Carwin beat Mir the way he beats everyone - by having the most hellaciously heavy hands in the UFC by far.
Because they clinched, went to the ground and Mir got ktfo, there was very little 'techincal' striking on display there, was clinch and ground work Where was his technical striking when he was being outstruck and even rocked by Gonzaga? Where was his technical striking when he spent a half a round punching Brock's forearm And best of all, when has he ever worked behind a jab like you claim C'mon, admitt it, you're just repeating **** you heard Michael Schiavello say while watching K1 aint ya?