Mitchell v burns poll

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by billy nelson, Aug 10, 2012.


  1. Clarky Cat

    Clarky Cat Stalwart Full Member

    2,279
    0
    Oct 8, 2010
    With the grasp of written English you have, you're not in much of a position to be calling anyone 'thick'.

    PS: it's 'Katsidis'.
     
  2. Bellewlovechild

    Bellewlovechild Active Member Full Member

    936
    0
    Jan 30, 2011
    Billy you massive liar he was never 9-2 he went off 11-4 are u suggested that Burns was backed in from 9-2 into 7-2 when there was only you and your scottish pound note backing Burns. its ok just admit you didnt get 9-2
     
  3. Bellewlovechild

    Bellewlovechild Active Member Full Member

    936
    0
    Jan 30, 2011
    and its murray not murry
     
  4. Bellewlovechild

    Bellewlovechild Active Member Full Member

    936
    0
    Jan 30, 2011
    if you could be honest at least admit you had it off betting on Burns to stop Cook early and the farcical Simpson v Selby fight when the price moved unbelievably after 1 minute of the fight.
     
  5. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    Both can box and both can brawl. Both are more effortless for burns who now has the confidence he lacked early in his career thus he is fulfilling his potential.

    Burns to retain against a fighter who has never successfully mixed it up at this level.
     
  6. facejacker

    facejacker New Member Full Member

    55
    0
    May 27, 2012