So b/c Floyd has done marginally better than PAC in US PPV numbers he's P4P king? Talk about being an idiot. Money doens't hold any weight in where a fighter ranks in the P4P standings. And there's not a snowballs chance in hell that anyone believe's that there's an argument that can be made for Floyd having a better resume!:rofl PAC's beaten all of Floyd's BEST opponents in more dominating fashion and has beaten men that Floyd has ducked at 147. Not to mention he doens't have anyone on his ledger that can match EM, MAB and JMM. Nice try kid.
Vitali would prolly do very good in MMA but there is not enough money for him to even bend over and pick up from the sidewalk in MMA
Comments like this are amusing because I've heard people make the same statement about boxing. Their stupidity rivals yours.
yea but floyd has much more technique and speed than pacquiao just compare wins floyd has 41 wins no losses pac has 3 losses and 2 draws 2 of the losses from nobodies and plus pac fought a dehydrated oscar de la hoya and every opponent pac has beaten floyd beat them first so suck on that ******.
thank God for google otherwise you wouldnt be able to come up with that. you havent seen any of them fight have you?