Modern heavyweights (height and weight) vs heavyweights from the 70's on

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by SuperPiccolo, Apr 1, 2018.


  1. Reg

    Reg Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,358
    6,886
    Feb 5, 2016
    The 90s is modern and is the start of the whole SHW argument. You're foolish if you deny that. But you already made that clear by calling Price a top HW.
     
  2. SuperPiccolo

    SuperPiccolo Member banned Full Member

    133
    46
    Mar 26, 2018
    Lol the first time anybody mentioned the term super heavyweight is when Wladimir became champion and that was in the 2000's. The 70s were the start of the modern heavyweight era when pretty much every single heavyweight worth mentioning was 6'2 plus. Lewis and Bowe were both around 6'4 3/4. Nobody called them super heavyweights. Bowe also lost to the 6'1 Holyfield. So nobody during that era thought being 6'5 meant you wouldn't lose to a guy shortre than that. Tyson was 5'10 and knocked out various 6'5 heavyweights.

    But you are clearly a fool and a lying fool since you said people started using the term super heavyweight back in the 90s. Good try though.
     
  3. Reg

    Reg Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,358
    6,886
    Feb 5, 2016
    Saying that the 90s is the proclaimed start of what people call the SHW era and saying that people started using the term SHW in the 90s are two completely different things. If this is as far as your reading comprehension goes then why bother continuing this argument on an overly rehashed topic?
     
    EnzoRD and Pat M like this.
  4. andrewa1

    andrewa1 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    7,005
    2,071
    Apr 8, 2013
    Still waiting for you to list the full group of one year, any year, of rings top ten hws from the 70s of 80s and compare them to the current list. Or for that matter, any ring list from this decade.
     
  5. Pat M

    Pat M Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,602
    3,926
    Jun 20, 2017
    This is my post from yesterday that got Super Piccolo fired up about the current heavyweights.

    "I just watched the fight, Joshua moved well, he jabbed, he kept his right hand up beside his jaw, he is a well schooled fighter. Parker is something that few heavyweights have had to contend with. He's 6-4, 235ish, has an extensive amateur background, and he is strong and quick. He isn't a lumbering 1973 George Foreman, (though Parker is much bigger), or a frail Cleveland Williams, he is an athletic, big, fighter. Put Joshua in with Zora Folley or Ken Norton you'd see highlight reel knockouts, but fighters who are as big and quick as Parker are not easy to beat or knockout. A lot of nostalgic people would get their feelings hurt if their favorite of the past could be transported to the present and stuck into a ring with Parker.

    I think the people who are so quick to criticize heavyweights of today don't understand the difference in size and strength that these boxers and their opponents possess compared to the fighters from the 60s, 70s and before."

    https://www.boxingforum24.com/threa...showed-he-can-win-without-getting-hit.605127/
     
    JoffJoff and andrewa1 like this.
  6. SuperPiccolo

    SuperPiccolo Member banned Full Member

    133
    46
    Mar 26, 2018
    Lol Parker isn't 6'4 he is shorter than the 6'2 1/2 Bellew
    This content is protected
    http://u.kahvipaketti.com/u/9166145557.jpg In reality Parker maybe be 6'2 . Didn't you just type the same thing kid? Are you just going to follow me around typing to same wrong info over and over again? If this how sad your life is? If this what your life has become?

    You basically copied and pasted that exact same line at least 10 times already. You must not have any friends, any prospects or anything else going in life. At least if you are going to copy and paste something do it with something that is truthful.

    Joseph Parker is 6'2 and 230 pounds overweight. George Foreman was 6'3 1/2 and 230 pounds and in shape. Lol so if you think that equals Parker being bigger than Foreman than you relaly don't have much common sense do you? I was going to block you, but thought you could at least type something intelligence in response to my question. But clearly you can't and you are just here to troll. The moderator should ban you but they probably won't. But I will block you.
     
  7. Pat M

    Pat M Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,602
    3,926
    Jun 20, 2017
    Foreman, wasn't even in shape at 220. Against Ali he was fatigued in a few rounds. At less than 230 he was falling around like a drunk against Jimmy Young. At about 215 he was again fatigued and falling around against Gregorio Peralta. Parker can go 12 rounds easily. Parker weighs in at 235 or more and his stamina is much better than Foreman's at 216. Parker fought a well conditioned, hard punching, 6-6, 245 pound man for 12 rounds and was in much better condition late in the fight than Foreman was against light punching Ali, and Jimmy Young.

    Today's heavyweights are year round professional boxers. They don't blow up between fights and then train 4-6 weeks. Take your nostalgia to somebody who doesn't know better.
     
    Staminakills likes this.
  8. deyell

    deyell MOLECULE FROM HELL. Full Member

    6,375
    5,468
    Aug 10, 2015
    :meparto:
     
  9. Staminakills

    Staminakills Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,329
    2,094
    Jun 8, 2012
    The above bold underlined facts hurt many fans, you forgot to mention no cigarette smoke could ever compete on the pro level while that was normal back in the day. But stop, some can't take truth very well when it hurts their favorite old unbeatable favorites
     
    Pat M likes this.
  10. SuperPiccolo

    SuperPiccolo Member banned Full Member

    133
    46
    Mar 26, 2018
    Actually it is funny. Povetkin fans have stated knocking out the 6'8 David Price shows how great Alexander is. So either you saying his fans are wrong and he isn't great or he is a great. It can't go both ways. In any case David Price was considered a top prospect until Tony Thompson knocked him out. Some Brits still think he is a good fighter. You can go to the thread made about him after Povetkin knocked him out. They are still saying he just needs to lose weight and workd on his stamina. I know David Price is a bum but the whole division is a joke now. That is whole point of me saying he is a top guy in this bad era.

    Also what does this have to do with his height? He is 6'8 and casual fans act like being 6'8 means you could beat something 6'3 or 6'4.
     
    Last edited: Apr 2, 2018
  11. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Loyal Member Full Member

    31,196
    29,158
    Apr 4, 2005
    Heavyweight are bigger today than in previous era's the empirical evidence of that is clear. Yes you'll have some fighters of the past era who are just as big as the modern super heavies today, but on average heavyweights are taller and heavier in the current modern era.

    Question is why is that? Fact is we as a species as a whole are getting taller. See article below, over the last century those in countries with better nutrition have seen a rise in height, those that have't are poorer countries in places like Africa where getting enough food let alone proper nutrition is still an issue. Only anomaly is the US which is shorter, though this is likely due to immigration from smaller ethnic groups. So if past heavies had access to the quality and amount of food we have, we'd likely have seen a 6'5-6'6" Foreman, a 6'4 Ali, a 6'2" Frazier etc.

    https://edition.cnn.com/2016/07/26/health/human-height-changes-century/index.html

    Heavyweights are heavier too. That will come down to 2 things, one obesity, we have a lot of out of shape heavyweights and the fact that boxers are now only having to fight 12 rounds not 15. So the physical requirements are slightly different, you don't need as much endurance so you can have bigger stronger fighters instead.
     
  12. SuperPiccolo

    SuperPiccolo Member banned Full Member

    133
    46
    Mar 26, 2018
    Lol again what does any of that have to do with my point? We are talking about boxing not people in general. Really tall guys still don't box in the USA. They play basketball still.

    You ever hear of this guy named George Foreman? You know he fought to the late 90s right. He was still pushing 6'4 230 pound PED users like Shannon Briggs and 6'5 230-240 pound guys like Lou Savarese around. So fighters now aren't stronger. You have no proof of this at all. Not to mention that has nothing do with me naming 30 fighters from the 70s been 6'3 to 6'5 plus and could of just kept naming 30 more boxers. That has nothing do with fighters back then being in shape and most fighters now being overweight who can't even go 3 rounds without being gassed out.

    Joseph Parker is 6'2 230 pounds, Luis Ortiz is 6'3 230 pounds, Alexander Povetkin is 6'2 220 pounds and they are no bigger than the 6'2 1/2 220 Muhummad Ali, 6'3 220 pound Ken Norton or the 6'3 230 pound Foreman. Then you have Anthony Joshua who is 6'5 and 230 but chooses to weigh more, 6'6 210 pound Deontay Wilder. Compared to 6'6 230 Al Jones, 6'5 240 Leroy Jones and the countless other fighters I named that height or more. So if you aren't going to stick to the question I asked then be a dear and not respond on my thread? Thanks.
     
    Jackomano likes this.
  13. Ph33rknot

    Ph33rknot Live as if you were to die tomorrow Full Member

    22,296
    22,075
    Mar 5, 2012
    I think forman hits as hard or harder than today's heavy weights
     
    Jackomano and SuperPiccolo like this.