Modern Nutrition

teeto · Mar 24, 2011

DDDUUDDDEE said: ↑

Goddamn son, I'm gettin' me some roids!... um I mean... modern nutrition...
Click to expand...

Exactly

DDDUUDDDEE · Mar 24, 2011

teeto said: ↑

Exactly
Click to expand...

Gonna hook up with Ariza, get me some of that a-side meff :deal

teeto · Mar 24, 2011

DDDUUDDDEE said: ↑

Gonna hook up with Ariza, get me some of that a-side meff :deal
Click to expand...

Yeah I'm just mixing a bit of the modern heroin now, enhances my posting style and intelect, **** the olden days.

DDDUUDDDEE · Mar 24, 2011

teeto said: ↑

Yeah I'm just mixing a bit of the modern heroin now, enhances my posting style and intelect, **** the olden days.
Click to expand...

Man, it's really great... this guy tried to mug me with a gun this morning, and he shot me in the stomach, but I didn't feel a thing and then I tore his ****ing arm off.

I bet Fitz couldn't do that... what a ****ing panzy hahaha

teeto · Mar 24, 2011

DDDUUDDDEE said: ↑

Man, it's really great... this guy tried to mug me with a gun this morning, and he shot me in the stomach, but I didn't feel a thing and then I tore his ****ing arm off.

I bet Fitz couldn't do that... what a ****ing panzy hahaha
Click to expand...

Yeah, Fitz would have no chance, but Fritzl would, he's been eating them coco pops for years.

DDDUUDDDEE · Mar 24, 2011

teeto said: ↑

Yeah, Fitz would have no chance, but Fritzl would, he's been eating them coco pops for years.
Click to expand...

Fritzl would annihilate Fitz.

Also Audley "A-force" Harrison would destroy a prime Jack Dempsey in 2. Why?, because he's newer. And black.

PowerPuncher · Mar 24, 2011

Swarmer said: ↑

Johnson was NOT a viable opponent of the time, no way. He got his teeth punched out by Willard years ago. That's just silly. Greb was a viable opponent as well, but you have to realize it was Kearns who would never let that happen, same with Wills. That same Kearns helped Dempsey develop into a much better boxer in 1918 and 1919 when he peaked...Almost every great fighter loses early in their career. Jack is no exception.Plenty of other fighters have engaged in ducking of their own, Johnson of Langford, Robinson of the murderer's, the list is long but nobody gets more flack for it than Dempsey. Sadly he gets torn apart by the detractors so much that nobody really talks about how well he did fight and the skills he did have these days. And that's unfair.
Click to expand...

The problem with Dempsey is the best men of his era were Tunney, Greb and Wills, he faced 1 of them and was largely dominated

Yes Willard did beat Johnson after losing the first 20 or so rounds, Johnson would have been better than most of the fighters Dempsey was facing even if he was old

Robinson's ducking of the murderer's row is excusable because of the fact he was never really within 10lbs of most of them bar Cocoa Kid, and Johnson actually beat Langford, didn't get big purses offered to face another black man and was hounded out of the country so I say he gets a pass

janitor · Mar 24, 2011

PowerPuncher said: ↑

The problem with Dempsey is the best men of his era were Tunney, Greb and Wills, he faced 1 of them and was largely dominated

Click to expand...

The three best men of his era in hindsight.

Tunneys claim to be the best fighter Dempsey ever faced rests almost entirely on the fact that he beat Dempsey, so it is circular logic to say that Dempsey lost to the best fighter he ever faced.

Wills claim to be the best contender of the era rests largley on the fact that Dempsey didn't fight him. If Dempsey beats him then he is just another Fred Fulton.

Yes Willard did beat Johnson after losing the first 20 or so rounds, Johnson would have been better than most of the fighters Dempsey was facing even if he was old

Click to expand...

It has to be noted that Willard was better than Johnson on the day they fought and neither Wills, nor Greb beat Willard.

Robinson's ducking of the murderer's row is excusable because of the fact he was never really within 10lbs of most of them bar Cocoa Kid
Click to expand...

They were the top contenders in the divisions that he was fighting in.

Dempsey was never within 10lbs of Wills or Greb but you don't give him a pass.

and Johnson actually beat Langford, didn't get big purses offered to face another black man and was hounded out of the country so I say he gets a pass
Click to expand...

Why should he get a pass?

Sam Fitzpatrick offered him $50 000 to fight Langford and Wills in Australia and Johnson kept bringing np minor objections to the contract at the last minute.
Click to expand...

PowerPuncher · Mar 24, 2011

janitor said: ↑

1. The three best men of his era in hindsight.

2. Tunneys claim to be the best fighter Dempsey ever faced rests almost entirely on the fact that he beat Dempsey, so it is circular logic to say that Dempsey lost to the best fighter he ever faced.

3. Wills claim to be the best contender of the era rests largley on the fact that Dempsey didn't fight him. If Dempsey beats him then he is just another Fred Fulton.

4. It has to be noted that Willard was better than Johnson on the day they fought and neither Wills, nor Greb beat Willard.

5. They were the top contenders in the divisions that he was fighting in.

6. Dempsey was never within 10lbs of Wills or Greb but you don't give him a pass.

Why should he get a pass?

7. Sam Fitzpatrick offered him $50 000 to fight Langford and Wills in Australia and Johnson kept bringing np minor objections to the contract at the last minute.
Click to expand...

1. Wills was the stand out no1 contender of the era for a 10year period, Dempsey was feasting on Greb leftovers, Tunney beat everyone bar the blk contenders

2. Now you're stooping to lies. Tunney beat GReb the best white contenders of the era, ie Gibbons, Carpentier, Risko, Heeney. He proved himself better than anyone Dempsey faced prior to facing Dempsey

3. Wills resume take a big **** on anything Fulton did and he battered him when they fought. Don't try to pretend Dempsey was beating anything close to WIlls level opposition in Fulton

4. Well under the 15round rules Dempsey fought under Johnson was the better man, but that aside even the old Johnson was likely a better opponent than any title defense Dempsey made.

5. No he was mainly compaigning at WW, the Murderer's Row were campaigning at MW and LHW, when he made a proper run for the title nearly all of them had moved up to LHW

6. Thats because his fans are making the unsubstantiated claim that he's numero uno HW of the era. He never proved it

7. I'm not sure on the details but McVey discredited allot of these offers and at the end of the day Johnson beat Langford anyway
Click to expand...

janitor · Mar 24, 2011

PowerPuncher said: ↑

janitor said: ↑

1. Wills was the stand out no1 contender of the era for a 10year period,

Click to expand...

Not even close to ten years.

Dempsey was feasting on Greb leftovers,
Click to expand...

Greb never fought Willard or Fulton. They were the champion and the top contender respectivley when Dempsey won the title.

Tunney beat everyone bar the blk contenders

Click to expand...

Tunneys heavyweight resume is actualy prety thin. I don't think we can say that he beat "everybody bar the black contenders".

2. Now you're stooping to lies. Tunney beat GReb the best white contenders of the era, ie Gibbons, Carpentier, Risko, Heeney. He proved himself better than anyone Dempsey faced prior to facing Dempsey

Click to expand...

He split a series with Greb and arguably lost it.

Gibbons was a good scalp, but he was past his best and Tunney had avoided him for years.

Carpintier was never one of the best anyway.

Heeney was a flash in the pan.

I realy don't see him as standing out among the pack here.

3. Wills resume take a big **** on anything Fulton did and he battered him when they fought. Don't try to pretend Dempsey was beating anything close to WIlls level opposition in Fulton

Click to expand...

Wills is built up quite a lot on the strength of Dempseys failure to meet him.

One thing that is often overlooked is the fact that he lost and drew with Bill Tate in the middle of this period. Strangley, the people whop are most critical of Dempsey, also claim that Tate was not world class. I can only say that if they are right, then that is verry damning for Wills.

If Dempsey beats Wills then you will get a lot of downgrading of Wills in hindsight.

4. Well under the 15round rules Dempsey fought under Johnson was the better man, but that aside even the old Johnson was likely a better opponent than any title defense Dempsey made.

Click to expand...

Hard to prove.

If Willard beat him then other people might have.

5. No he was mainly compaigning at WW, the Murderer's Row were campaigning at MW and LHW, when he made a proper run for the title nearly all of them had moved up to LHW

Click to expand...

Robinson shared the rankings with the murer row crew at welterweight for several years.

There was more than a passing interest in those matches.

6. Thats because his fans are making the unsubstantiated claim that he's numero uno HW of the era. He never proved it

Click to expand...

If Dempsey wasn't then who else was?

Who else could put forward a claim and on what basis?

7. I'm not sure on the details but McVey discredited allot of these offers and at the end of the day Johnson beat Langford anyway
Click to expand...

I can assure you that the Fitzpatrick offers are verry verry well substantiated. Johnson could have got a $30 000 purse to fight Langford, albeit outside the USA and relativley late in his reign.

Johnson should not get a pass because he fought a green Langford who was just stepping up to heavyweight for the first time. If Hank Griffin had got hold of the title in Johnsons prime, would he not have needed to fight Johnson because he had beaten a green version?
Click to expand...

Click to expand...

Kalasinn · Mar 24, 2011

Modern Nutrition...

This content is protected

This content is protected
:-D:happy:hat:boogie:bananamaniac:freddy

sirhenrycooper6 · Mar 24, 2011

it is better .
look at how much better , champs like ,
klitschkos , bowe , lewis , holy ,
are compared 2 old fighters .
it is clear as 1 day and 1 night

Kalasinn · Mar 24, 2011

sirhenrycooper6 said: ↑

it is better .
look at how much better , champs like ,
klitschkos , bowe , lewis , holy ,
are compared 2 old fighters .
it is clear as 1 day and 1 night
Click to expand...

Y'all musta forgot Shannon the Cannon, he's far more muscular than all those pansys.

sirhenrycooper6 · Mar 24, 2011

Kalasinn said: ↑

Y'all musta forgot Shannon the Cannon, he's far more muscular than all those pansys.
Click to expand...

ye but ,
he sucks

LongJab · Mar 24, 2011

"I'll lick any man in the house!"

John L. Sullivan was an absolute failure. Modern nutrition wouldn't even be able to cure that disgusting build of his. That sollen gut, douce-bag mustache... what a wanker.

Sully was a miserable boxer.

Log in or Sign up

Modern Nutrition

teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

DDDUUDDDEE Undisputed Ambien (taker) Full Member

teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

DDDUUDDDEE Undisputed Ambien (taker) Full Member

teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

DDDUUDDDEE Undisputed Ambien (taker) Full Member

PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

janitor VIP Member Full Member

PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

janitor VIP Member Full Member

Kalasinn ♧ OG Kally ♤ Full Member

sirhenrycooper6 Guest

Kalasinn ♧ OG Kally ♤ Full Member

sirhenrycooper6 Guest

LongJab Active Member Full Member

Log in or Sign up

Forums

Modern Nutrition

teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

DDDUUDDDEE Undisputed Ambien (taker) Full Member

teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

DDDUUDDDEE Undisputed Ambien (taker) Full Member

teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

DDDUUDDDEE Undisputed Ambien (taker) Full Member

PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

janitor VIP Member Full Member

PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

janitor VIP Member Full Member

Kalasinn ♧ OG Kally ♤ Full Member

sirhenrycooper6 Guest

Kalasinn ♧ OG Kally ♤ Full Member

sirhenrycooper6 Guest

LongJab Active Member Full Member