Molitor vs. 3K Battery Rd by Rd?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by SkunkApe, Oct 27, 2007.


  1. SkunkApe

    SkunkApe New Member Full Member

    86
    0
    Sep 2, 2004
    Anyone doing a a round by round on Steve Molitor vs. 3K battery?
     
  2. Zakman

    Zakman ESB's Chinchecker Full Member

    31,785
    2,974
    Apr 16, 2005
    What the hell kinda name is "3K Battery??"
     
  3. Jbuz

    Jbuz Belt folder Full Member

    3,506
    7
    Oct 22, 2004
    It is possibly the worst name I've ever heard. What kind of a name has a number in it? And ****ing "battery"?
     
  4. SkunkApe

    SkunkApe New Member Full Member

    86
    0
    Sep 2, 2004
    Steve Molitor: Undefeated IBF 122-lb. champion for Canada.

    Fahsan 3K Battery: 58-8, currently on a 14-fight winning streak. Lost to Pacquiao in 2004.

    It's on Canadian TV.
     
  5. lzolnier

    lzolnier Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,524
    34
    Jan 20, 2007
    This content is protected
     
  6. chimba

    chimba Off the Somali Coast Full Member

    20,005
    7
    Mar 8, 2007
    FYI theres alot of 3k Battery in Thailand..They like this name. Its a motorcycle Battery and in order to promote it... fighters use it...

    Its like the Golden Palace ad in BHOPs backs some years back.

    Pacquaio beat a 3k battery...its a different one than this battery..Lots of them
     
  7. SkunkApe

    SkunkApe New Member Full Member

    86
    0
    Sep 2, 2004
    Nope. It's this battery. Just checked boxing records archive.

    3K Battery is a company who makes motorcycle batteries in Thailand. They pay boxers to change their names to "3K Battery" for advertising purposes.
     
  8. lzolnier

    lzolnier Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,524
    34
    Jan 20, 2007

    This content is protected
     
  9. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    pacquiao beats this 3k battery (Fahsan) 3 years ago. but he was beaten by another 3k battery (singsurat) when he was weight-drained at 112 then.
     
  10. chimba

    chimba Off the Somali Coast Full Member

    20,005
    7
    Mar 8, 2007
    Damn look at that A fighter Pacquiao Mopped the place with at 122 is still a contender...that says alot...Im rooting for my Mississauga boy Molitor though
     
  11. Jbuz

    Jbuz Belt folder Full Member

    3,506
    7
    Oct 22, 2004
    I just wanna say something about this:

    When people say "Pac has come up 13452 divisions, that's why his accompishments are more impressive"... it is a silly argument. Because if you're going to count his time in those weight classes, then you have to count his two KO losses. He WAS weight drained, because he didn't belong there... he is a natural 130lber. He has filled out his frame and he is made for 130.
     
  12. chimba

    chimba Off the Somali Coast Full Member

    20,005
    7
    Mar 8, 2007
    Hellfire..you should know more than PAC at 122 bro...No one will disagree that it was his prime peak weight/...He got known for Beating Legends but he had to chase these fights to make money...

    If you watch any of his undercard fights and listen to the commentators...the question they have is when will PAC chase the big money fights...because he was such a devastating force at that weight
     
  13. nervousxtian

    nervousxtian Trolljegeren Full Member

    14,035
    1,074
    Aug 6, 2005
    No, same dude.

    It is an ad though for a last name. A lot of thai fighters do this, as there names are typically ungodly long and unpronouncable.
     
  14. Jbuz

    Jbuz Belt folder Full Member

    3,506
    7
    Oct 22, 2004
    I'm not degrading what he achieved at 122, I'm referring to the argument some people put forth about Pac coming up from 112 to dominate 130. In reality, he was never made for 112, which was proven by his losses there. All I'm saying is - it can't be both ways, "Pac came from 112 to 130" AND "Pac's losses are because he drained himself".

    And are you saying Pac was best at 122? You may well be right, I haven't see much of him there, but he wasn't proven at 122 like he was at 126 and 130. He didn't beat any really big names, like he has at 126 and 130. And just watching him now, he has improved out of sight in the last few years, he just looks much better, and more comfortable with his weight than he has ever been. I think he's a natural 130lber.
     
  15. chimba

    chimba Off the Somali Coast Full Member

    20,005
    7
    Mar 8, 2007
    I agree that PAc may well have been predisposed to 130 even 135. But at 122 he just run out of opponents because the division was shallow at the time.. He was faster and of course packed more punch... No doubt that he wouldnt have been considered ATG if not for beating MAB and Erik and that Epic with JMM.

    But at 122 he did beat world class fighters in champ Lebwadha and Julio... eradicated a prospect Lucero...These guys arent elites but very good..and the way PAC demolished them was just unbelievable. If you watch the Julio fight in YT..Youd here Bobby Cyz and the PbyP guy "What a prospect" the crowd was mesmerized at the display...