Money Mayweather vs Sugar Ray Robinson

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by jyuza, May 4, 2010.


  1. sugarsean

    sugarsean Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,496
    14
    Jun 2, 2009
    :patsch

    he was 37 years old and well past his peak, the extra weight was just from age, not his natural weight,
     
  2. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    82
    Sep 3, 2007
    Robinson by KO, bigger & better.
     
  3. jyuza

    jyuza Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,394
    8
    Sep 12, 2005
    I wish people wouldn't pick an old version of the Robinson for this match up.
     
  4. sugarsean

    sugarsean Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,496
    14
    Jun 2, 2009
    I know, it really pisse's me off whenever they bring up the Basillio fight.
     
  5. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    400
    Jan 22, 2010
    So true,Sugarsean...This old adage applies to some people...
    " There is none so blind as people who have eyes, but do not see ".
    Age is a chain that greatly slows our reflexes...More so with fighters...b.b.
     
  6. Casey91

    Casey91 Member Full Member

    348
    1
    Dec 22, 2009
    Yeah,in the basilio fight he was 37 and fighting at middleweight(although it was a great fight) it was far from a PRIME WW Ray.
     
  7. jyuza

    jyuza Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,394
    8
    Sep 12, 2005
    Not bad.

    I am pretty damn sure those having Money winning this don't even know the basis about Ray Robinson like his birth name or the name of the very first man to ever defeat him. They probably even never took the time to watch footage of this legend. Those guy watched couple of highlights and think they know everything about Sugar. It's kind of scary.
     
  8. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    its closer then you guys make it out to be,

    but that why your such a great group.


    Here we stand up for our heros and legends!
     
  9. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,099
    10,508
    Jul 28, 2009
    Not familiar with you as a poster so I don't know how to take that comment exactly.
     
  10. jyuza

    jyuza Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,394
    8
    Sep 12, 2005
    My thought exactly. :good
     
  11. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    lol hmmm

    take it without sarcasm if thats what you meant.

    Let me try to clarify my earlier post better:

    I think the fight would be closer than people are mking it out to be

    I think SRR would end up wooping his ass and winning by KO

    Im happy that people here would think it is such a big mismatch.

    Because people these days don't understand how great the old timers were

    And its good to see a group of people who understand and know their greatness, especially when comparing them to todays fighters.

    ________

    Try now!
     
  12. jyuza

    jyuza Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,394
    8
    Sep 12, 2005
    Fair enough :good
     
  13. round15

    round15 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,370
    45
    Nov 27, 2007
    Prime for prime?

    Robinson by close, but clear UD over 15 rounds, 9-6 or 8-7. Eddie Futch called Mayweather the best prospect he's seen since Robinson, but Mayweather is no Sugar Ray. He's approaching Sugar Ray's league IMO, but not quite there yet.

    Perhaps in a few years, Mayweather may put his skills to the test, correct me if I'm wrong, by giving away 10 or more pounds like Robinson did vs Joey Maxim. He's got to dispose of Pacquiao first. It's not Mayweather's fault, but he doesn't have a LaMotta, a Basilio, a Gene Fullmer, or a Kid Gavilan type fighter to his resume. This itself is the main reason why Robinson is ranked higher and would win a head to head, prime for prime matchup.
     
  14. jyuza

    jyuza Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,394
    8
    Sep 12, 2005
    Well, Floyd did have the oppurtunity to fight bigger man like Margarito or Cotto. But they weren't bringing much to the table back then so...
     
  15. baddest

    baddest Member Full Member

    109
    0
    May 2, 2010
    I feel as though alot of people are not factoring important variables that could change the outcome of this fight. Let us remember that Robinson was a star of the 1940's, at a time when Boxing had never seen a fighter like himself, the typical boxer was a come-forward brawler, because boxing, moreso then than now, was primarily focused on the KO's. Robinson didn't regularly fight pure boxers of the pedigree of a FMJ, Whitaker, or Pep, and the boxer he did fight that was an ATG like Gavilan, gave him troubles. Now it's a given that had he been trained uner modern regiments he would probably more familiar with these styles, but would he still have the same explosiveness at his natural weight? what with changes in glove size, weigh in regulations, etc I'm skeptical that if this hypothetical matchup were to occur today that SRR would be as fast, and powerful at 147 as he was in the 40's. Mayweather on the other hand, probably would've been faster, and his punches might have more sting to them if he were to be a 147 welter in the 40's. Mayweather also dealt, with similar fighters to SRR, no not anywhere near his class but certainly he's dealt with them. Corrales, Mosley, etc etc.

    Now, that said I'm not saying Mayweather wins this but I think he has more of a chance then some would give him. Personally, I don't think it fair to have this match up until we see MAyweather tested against an ATG.