Monthly heavyweight rankings from 1882 onwards

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by SimonLock, Aug 3, 2022.


  1. Greg Price99

    Greg Price99 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,044
    9,729
    Dec 17, 2018
    Full respect & credit, Simon, for these wonderful updates. I've no doubt this is a gargantuan undertaking, though I'm sure you're thoroughly enjoying the process.
     
    SimonLock likes this.
  2. SimonLock

    SimonLock Member Full Member

    395
    592
    Nov 15, 2018
    Thanks Greg, appreciate the feedback. I’ve had some time off before doing 1896 so hoping to keep it going now. It’s certainly interesting and there are lots of parallels with modern day boxing.
     
    Greg Price99 likes this.
  3. SimonLock

    SimonLock Member Full Member

    395
    592
    Nov 15, 2018
    Tagging in @mattdonnellon for his opinion on 1896 and comparison of our year-end rankings.
     
  4. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,617
    1,884
    Dec 2, 2006
    Simon's ratings listed after mine.
    NR =Not rated.
    Champion Corbett-2
    2. Fitzsimmons-1
    3. Maher--3
    4 Choynski-4
    5. Sharkey-9
    6. Armstrong-8
    7. Creedon-10
    8. Goddard-5
    9. Ruhlin-NR
    10. O’Donnell-NR
    NR Smith-6
    NR Hall-7
    IMO Hall had done nothing of note in years, Smith had dined out on beating Goddard, now that was gone. Goddard himself was in decline.losses to Laing and Felix since the Smith defeat. My ratings are old and with hindsight I would have Walter Johnson in at 10 over O'Donnell, wins over Slavin, O'Donnell and a draw with Armstrong would be enough. Ruhlin had not done a whole pile by 1896 and should not be there either. I have Corbett as champion, once he unretired he was generally accepted as champion. BTW Maher was 30 years old in 1896. Not sure who should be at number 10....
     
    Greg Price99, SimonLock and BoB Box like this.
  5. SimonLock

    SimonLock Member Full Member

    395
    592
    Nov 15, 2018
    For 1896 then, @mattdonnellon and I agree on 8 names. We have the same top 4, albeit with the rival champions in a different order.

    I have Jim Hall and Ed Smith, and Matt has Johnson + 1 other.

    I think that Hall’s performance against Choynski (#4) was strong enough to maintain his spot in the top 10. He had Choynski all but beaten in the 9th round, and by all accounts caused serious damage to Choynski from which he took some time to recover.

    I agree that Smith hadn’t done much since beating Goddard, but he had stayed active and kept winning which is more than can be said for some.

    I did have Walter Johnson included in a draft version of this year, but ultimately took the decision that his wins were more evidence that Slavin and O’Donnell had fallen off than evidence that he was a top level fighter. His resume is thin and these wins were only 4-rounders meaning I don’t give them as much weight as a longer fight or a knockout.

    I think Mick Dooley would also be in contention, although his performances in the last 2 fights with Felix damaged his standing somewhat.
     
    mattdonnellon and Greg Price99 like this.
  6. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,617
    1,884
    Dec 2, 2006
    I think I'll give my number 10 slot to Peter Felix.
     
    SimonLock likes this.
  7. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,617
    1,884
    Dec 2, 2006
    A shot in the dark to see how SimonLock got on with this enormous effort!
    My 1897 year end ratings;
    Champion Fitzsimmons
    2. Maher
    3. Sharkey
    4. Choynski
    5. Childs
    6. Corbett
    7. Ruhlin
    8. Jeffries
    9. O’Donnell
    10. Armstrong

    Maybe Hall should be there?
     
    SimonLock likes this.
  8. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,724
    4,158
    Jan 6, 2024
    In December of 1897 Hall would win the earliest claimed LHW title fight with Slavin. Though boxing rec claims it was a HW match they don't have weight figures for the match.
     
  9. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,617
    1,884
    Dec 2, 2006
    I could never verify that fight, I certainly don't think it took place on that date. It is unlikely Slavin could make the weight either.
     
    HistoryZero26 and Melankomas like this.