After the Bute Andrade fight i thought this was done with. to me this is bs. hopkins honestly won. i thought that the better man would win. this is bs. hopkins deserved the win. what do you guys think? am i delusional lol or jsut seeing things differently? to me even at 46 hopkins did what was needed and won this fight.
yeah but i do felt that b hop won. to each his own. i agree that the andrade fight was criminal though.
1- Are you like a total ****in' air head or you got alzheimer's.... atsch How many ****in' threads about Andrade-Bute I do you have to read to understand the real facts ?? Get hooked on phonics if need be.... 2- If you do know how to score a fight...know that after 4 rounds, Pascal was ahead 40-34 on most people's score cards...that makes it at most a close Hopkins win at the end of it...
same **** different toilet. i called this before the fight(as did many posters on here) a fair decision was not going to be reached.
I am living in quebec and I am ashame! this has to stop! This place is great for boxing , why **** it up?
The world revolves around the US of A and anything anywhere else ain't worth ****...is corrupt or not worthy. Thank God for the wisdom and enlightenment from the P4P most obese and dumbed down industrialized country in the world..:good
is it legal to start a poll to ban posters, for exemple Auracle21? must have loose a lot of money on Andrade-Bute I or something.
Yes, dude. Delusional is you. First of all, what's Montreal got to do with it ? Secondly, Pascal led 40 -34 (not controversial) going into the fifth. If Pascal won just ONE round of the last eight, the result was a draw. Bernard fought well, and is to be commended, but deciding that giving Pascal one round out of the last eight is a robbery ? Yes, that's delusional.