monzon and hagler slightly overrated?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by cobra1, Nov 30, 2010.


  1. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    I'm looking forward to the day Swarmer gets rid of that disgusting avatar, so why do I keep looking at it?:patsch
     
  2. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    What? He's just sipping on some scotch.
     
  3. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    52
    Sep 8, 2007
    unless he just milked the highlander, i don't think so...
     
  4. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    uhhh. it's apple juice.
     
  5. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,149
    10,572
    Jul 28, 2009
    :rofl I'm glad you found a new avatar. But is that really better than my SNV/RJJ rap gif? ...Really? Because it came straight from their music video...
     
  6. Bollox

    Bollox Active Member Full Member

    1,484
    9
    Mar 12, 2010
    You need to look at Hagler's complete career rather than just the championship years. He fought arguably better opposition before he even won the title. As for him being beaten by a welter in Leonard? That'd be the same Leonard that was beaten by a lightweight?
     
  7. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    I agree somewhat. When talking about the atg mws those two are more often than not inside the Top3. While I don´t want to argue they aren´t, I have to say that in those lists Pre-WW2 mws are very often underappreciated despite some of the very best of all-time fighting during that time.

    Check out my thread on the ATG mws and add your opinion. :deal
    http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=271196&highlight=the+atg+middleweights


    Not with footage of the St. Valentine massacre around IMO.
     
  8. goat15

    goat15 Active Member Full Member

    926
    0
    Nov 10, 2010
    both dominated in a spectacular and unique manner. they could have fought in tougher eras, true. they just beat who was put in front of them. should they have moved up to light heavyweight? no, their dominance would have been curtailed, and i'd rather see that.

    should they have moved up at the 'end' of their careers? i'd rather see fighters retire on a high, in tact.

    they're both overrated in the sense that they're both talked about as being 'complete' and 'unbeatable' fighters. neither is true of either.
     
  9. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    78
    Apr 4, 2010
    So noone understood that my post was sarcastic?
     
  10. goat15

    goat15 Active Member Full Member

    926
    0
    Nov 10, 2010
    lol first thing i thought after reading the first few responses.
     
  11. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    Same here, this is ground breaking
     
  12. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,235
    6,499
    Jan 22, 2009
    :goodFar and away the best contri on this thread:good
     
  13. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,714
    3,456
    Jan 6, 2007
    Nothing against Monzon nor Hagler.

    Like to see them in the 1945-1965 MW division against that type of deep competition.
     
  14. DonBoxer

    DonBoxer The Lion! Full Member

    8,063
    34
    Apr 28, 2010
    This thread makes me want to cry.
     
  15. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    30,278
    5,904
    Oct 5, 2009
    couldnt the same be said of Hopkins?


    Watch Hagler he is not over rated