Monzon v McCallum at 160

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by fists of fury, Sep 8, 2015.


  1. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,046
    Oct 25, 2006
    'Escopeta' vs. 'The Bodysnatcher.'

    Small catch...over 12 rounds.

    No doubting who was greater at 160-Monzon clearly-but how does the iron-chinned and well-schooled McCallum do over the shorter championship distance of 12 rounds?
    I chose the shorter distance to give Mike a better chance. Does it make a difference?
     
  2. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,441
    45,928
    Feb 11, 2005
    12 rounds makes it a bit closer. Mike was clever and cute and could thump but was neither unhittable or uniquely mobile. I just have to bet on the guy with the greater championship record in this one. And I really like Mike...

    As far as the observable factors, I think that Monzon's timing throws off Mike's attack. Monzon was really good at figuring out his opponents' timing and tendencies in very quick fashion. He made openings happen. It could be close 116-114 but Carlos almost always turned up the heat when necessary.
     
  3. Rafaman

    Rafaman Active Member Full Member

    1,009
    439
    Jun 26, 2015
    Great fight. Monzon still wins on points but Mike gives him fits and tests Monzon. McClallum has the chin to last the distance and can counter Monzon inside to the body. I think Monzon's jab eventually takes over in the late rounds but Monzon would not be able to cruise. Mike's jab was a great weapon plus he was hard to hit with his defense. The 160lb McClallum who fought Watson was so on point and has all the tools to trouble any ATG.
     
  4. Foxy 01

    Foxy 01 Boxing Junkie banned

    12,328
    131
    Apr 23, 2012
    MM is one of my favourite fighters, but in a very close and good fight I think Monzon is a stretch too far for Mike.
     
  5. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,325
    9,939
    Jun 23, 2008
    I've said this before several times and I'll say it again, McCallum is overrated. As a MIDDLEWEIGHT he's overrated. He was truly awesome at 154. People like to believe that he could given Hagler and Monzon very close fights, but it's not true. He would have lost by a clear margin to b either one.

    Not saying he doesn't take a few rounds off Monzon, but Monzon would be in command the entire time. The myth of McCallum grows
     
  6. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,574
    Jan 30, 2014
    I agree with every sentence here. :good I think that several of the late 80s/90s middleweights could have given Monzon problems, but I don't see McCallum as one of them.
     
  7. Phil_Ivey_76

    Phil_Ivey_76 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,823
    175
    Aug 26, 2013
  8. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    Monzon on points. McCallum is one of those very good, but not great types.

    I do like the match up though. Did Monzon ever fight a tall middle who can hit and take a punch?
     
  9. Bulldog24

    Bulldog24 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,302
    4,161
    Aug 2, 2013
    Nice long body area for McCallum to target with his long downstair counters, timing the Monzon straights.
     
  10. jarama

    jarama Active Member Full Member

    906
    262
    May 13, 2014
    Have to go fpr Monzon in this, in a close but good fight
     
  11. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,441
    45,928
    Feb 11, 2005
    Monzon timed his opponents amazingly well. Think on that.