Your entire post is useless, which is very unusual for you. You seem to be saying that size and physical strength don't matter. And at the same time, denying that Pavlik is WAY bigger than Monzon was. That makes no sense whatsoever. All you did in your post was the routine drill: over rate the old timer, and under rate the modern fighter. Monzon would have none of his usual advantages, and he would be fighting a guy who is extremely hard to hurt and has outstanding recuperative powers if he does get hurt. He might win a decision against Pavlik, but I read several posts on here that said stupid **** like Monzon by KO easy. Monzon would find himself in a very difficult fight against a man who is bigger, stronger, and hits way harder.
No: breakdown is better than no breakdown. Maybe. I mean, maybe Monzon could have out-weighed Gerald McClellan on fight night at Middleweight. But it seems reasonable to assume that the man with the bigger frame and who has to live off cabbage soup for a week to make weight isn't going to want to step in the ring against another fighter looking to rip his head off on an empty stomach. Pavlik throws lots more punches than Monzon, put it that way. The only fight where I've seen Monzon throw that much was against Griffith the second time around, and he quickly slowed down after half-way. So Monzon is stylistically similar to Hopkins?
Unless you are going to say that Monzon was weight drained most of his career, you have to assume he would fight at a lower weight under the 30 hour weigh in rules. There is no reason to believe he would fight at 160 under todays rules where junior middleweights are routinely 3-5 pounds over the middleweight limit at fight time. Monzon was regularly under 160 on the day of the fight. In other words, he weighed less at fight time than Martinez and Cintron, and he was only a 1/2" taller. Think before you post. [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yYBLjvYCEIk[/ame]
This confusion about weigh ins never ceases to amaze. Boo Radley, two things. 1 - Just because a guy weighs 158 at the weigh in doesn't mean he weighs 158 "at fight time". In the interceeding 8, 6, 4, 9 or 2 hours he will gain weight in water, especially if he is muscling the limit. 2 - Kelly Pavlik could have fought under the old rules for 160 weigh ins without difficult. The only stipulation is that a fighter weighs 160lbs on the scales.
You make absolute no sense. What are you talking about fight night weights for? If you think he could of made junior-middle or even welterweight, why didn't he?
They matter mate...but its just one part of the whole picture. Carlos was superior to Kelly in a lot of areas and most of all proved it against a higher calibre of opposition. Kelly may have him with those two things but you are kidding yourself if you think they will have such a big impact when Monzon's superior skills, timing, chin, ring generalship and ring smarts will most definitely play a bigger role in how this fight plays out.
I am denying that Pavlik is "way bigger" because he simply isn't "way bigger". I honestly don't even think he hit much harder either, if at all. KO'ing guys like Taylor and Miranda, both of whom would've been stopped by Monzon in a similar manner, doesn't prove it one way or the other. Pavlik is considered a huge puncher because his secondary assets aren't up to much, therefore his main trait is as a puncher. Such was not the case for Monzon, despite the fact that he often stopped much better fighters than not only the ones Pavlik has beaten, but Pavlik himself. I certainly didn't deny that size and physical strength mattered, you just vastly overrated how much of an advantage in those categories Pavlik would have over Monzon. I certainly wouldn't give him any advantage in strength for one, in fact it'd bee the opposite in that regard. Monzon proved himself a much more physically imposing fighter in close than Pavlik ever has. I know you love your boy, but he's badly outclassed here.
I know its a current fad to rip on Pavlik and a lot of it is warranted but even with that, he isn't beating Monzon. Monzon is one of the best middleweights of all-time and is simply too well rounded for Pavlik. I think Pavlik would do ok for himself and I don't think he gets stopped but he's losing against Monzon.
I hate it the way most fans will jump off a fighter's bandwagon after a loss...It's a learning experience! Sylistically Pavlik would give Monzon some problems, but it would be in the ability to adapt that would see Monzon come out an eventual (comfortable) winner. Pavlik at this point in time, can be counted on to either jab, double jab, hook, and cross in set patterns. Monzon on the other hand, while he has the same basic style...Has the experience to vary pace, distance, output...In these ways, Monzon's boxing IQ is far and away ahead of Pavlik. Monzon's excellent jab is what sets him apart...I could be totally wrong, but what I think Hopkins means when talking Monzon, is that his style would be difficult to read due to the way Monzon would vary the speed, power, and range of his jab...and he also used it to blind the opponent. Also, Monzon's sense of distance in a fight is great.
When did I say that? I'm not saying Monzon wouldn't beat Pavlik - I'm assuming he would - but I think it's fair to say that he's not going to be doing it the way Hopkins did. Remember, the thread was started as a question about what kind of approach Monzon would take, and an answer comparing him to Hopkins isn't going to be particularly illustrative. Talk about putting words in my mouth. I'm sorry I started this thread now. Obviously, it's cardinal sin to even ask questions about how people see a fight playing out, and we should just bow down with unfettered reverence to the greater fighter without a contrary word or even so much as an inquisitive spirit.
Now you're moving the goal-posts. The issue (at least implicitly) was whether Monzon would be able to beat Pavlik by out-pressuring him. I don't think so, since Pavlik is generally the more active fighter, as I pointed out. If someone takes the play away from him (Hopkins) then he's not going to have the same output. But Monzon doing that would hardly be "out-pressuring" Pavlik, so that comment is irrelevant. And if you think Monzon could do a Hopkins, I'd be interested to know how.