Monzon vs Sugar Ray Leonard

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Longhhorn71, Dec 19, 2010.


  1. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    59,194
    42,127
    Feb 11, 2005
    Does the version of Hagler that fought Leonard (or Mugabi) beat the version of Valdez that Monzon fought?
     
  2. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    260
    Jul 22, 2004
    I don't see why not, he still has the skill advantage and in truth the performances against both Mugabi and Leonard are underrated. Not to mention Monzon himself was beating Valdez at the age of 35, Hagler was 31-32 in those fights and is generally considered Monzon's equal
     
  3. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,295
    509
    Feb 17, 2010
    I don't think Hagler looked as skilled as Valdez against Leonard.Mugabi, yes...that was methodical controlled boxing of a high quality for the most part.

    His pure boxing against Ray was poor that nght when he attempted it, and he basically resorted to marching forward letting go often telegraphed combinations and winging bombs.

    Not saying he wasn't still effective and really good doing it(and might beat Valdez indeed), but it was will over skill.
     
  4. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    260
    Jul 22, 2004
    Do you think the reason he didn't look as skilled maybe the opponent he had in front of him and he had that split second or 2 less to get out the way of shots or get off? IMO he realised he had to turn bull after the usual boxer puncher game failed him
     
  5. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,295
    509
    Feb 17, 2010
    In part, but he could have gone about the aggressive strategy in a more skilled manner than he did.Keeping his punches a lot tighter for one.the straight left was notably off-form.

    I'd say he flat out didn't fight too well that night(as well as being on the decline of course).Ray had really got into his head i guess.
     
  6. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    260
    Jul 22, 2004
    Again its harder to get your punches as straight and precise on a moving target when you have to keep quickly resetting your footwork and you end up not being in a position to punch. Hagler never had to hunt a mover of this calbre before.

    Hagler's legs in turn probably didn't have the steam they had earlier in his career but I'm sure he was prepared to the utmost for this fight, he likely trained harder than he had in a long time. From what I remember though Leonard himself seemed a little gassed at times and resorted to taking rounds off.
     
  7. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,826
    12,496
    Jan 4, 2008
    Hagler had slowed when Leonard caught up with him, but Leonard surely made him look worse than he was. Leonard's movement is in many ways close to perfect in the fight. He uses angles and widens/closes distance at precisely right moments. What's missing is punching off his moves.
     
  8. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,826
    12,496
    Jan 4, 2008
    That's a bold prediction I'd say.
     
  9. Nemesis

    Nemesis Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,650
    13
    Dec 9, 2005
    I'd fancy Leonard to pull it out UD (15)
     
  10. monzón was stronger than hearns , he had much better chin, and he was a natural middle(one of the best if not the best mw ever) ,hearns was not. great difference
     
  11. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,714
    3,448
    Jan 6, 2007
    Leonard "reached" Hearns who was even bigger than Monzon.

    Leonard would hit Monzon too, who is slower and less the boxer than Hearns.

    Emile Griffith, who was not much more than a Jr. MW, went 29 competitive rounds with Monzon...though he lost twice.

    Griffith was only 5' 7-1/2", with a 72 inch reach.

    Leonard was bigger and faster.
     
  12. dpw417

    dpw417 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,461
    344
    Jul 13, 2007
    Do you peg Leonard for an upset Paul?
    Leonard was an incredible all time talent so it isn't out of the realm of possiblity. Bouttier did pretty well for a time against Monzon in the first fight, and Licata also troubled Monzon a bit with movement. But fifteen rounds is a long time. Leonard eventually had to come down off his toes as he did to engage Hearns after he hurt him, Leonard won't be able to hurt a bigger Monzon, that leaves him the only option of having to move continually like he did in the early rounds against Hearns...He might steal some of those rounds, but the physical exertion necessary on a smaller man to do that would be tremendous. I just Leonard struggling to make it close, where as Monzon would be in cruise control after the middle rounds. I think Monzon would close the gap and pull ahead down the stretch. Monzon is the epitome of a consistant champion. Either at the top, or very, very , near it at the middleweight limit. I think Monzon used his attributes to the fullest of any champion I've seen on film.
     
  13. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,423
    1,447
    Sep 7, 2008
    I know, but I personally roll with the notion that Hagler had slipped by the time Ray was actually up for fighting him.
     
  14. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,826
    12,496
    Jan 4, 2008
    I agree with that. But a Leonard who'd stayed active (without injuries or personal/drug problems) and gradually made his way up to MW would be a clearly better fighter than the one who faced Hagler IMO.

    Very speculative of course. But it's a bit sad that Leonard, just like Ali, missed out on his best years. He could have peaked at LMW and really been a force there. There were some very good LMWs around at the time, so we probably missed out on a couple of really good fights.
     
  15. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,423
    1,447
    Sep 7, 2008
    The Kalule win was super impressive IMO.