Mugabi was a big star and closer to his prime than valdez but Valdez was more established. The champs only made about 100,000 back then. Did anyone even follow the middleweights in those days?
Yeah. When Monzon fought Valdez, Valdez was the man to fight. There wasn't a better middleweight in the world. Mugabi, while promising, was certainly not the best man.
Hagler fougt far better v Mugabi than Monzon did v Valdez, I felt Monzon v Valdez was a sloppy fight, but Hagler v Mugabi was epic, Mugabi was trying to counter every punch Hagler threw and was bigger than Hagler, he would have blown Valdez away.
He did but Hagler had visibly declined too. Hagler - Hearns was an even quicker pace as well and Tommy wasn't infallible on the stamina front. Green, not a big hitter by any stretch had him reeling and Mugabi himself said he was saved by the bell tho he did have a bit of time to navigate. It was a great challenge and a very enjoyable stoush but truth be told he never looked like beating a faded Hagler and lost heart at the end.
According to some, Hagler had to be wheeled to the ring and propped up for his fight against Mugabi since he was an old, shot, completely done fighter lol.
1986: Middleweights Junior Middleweights Welterweights Marvin Hagler, Champion Thomas Hearns Robbie Sims Herol Graham Iran Barkley Michael Olajide James Kinchen Milton McCrory Michael Nunn Lindell Holmes Frank Tate Title Vacant Duane Thomas Mike McCallum Buster Drayton John Mugabi Matthew Hilton Donald Curry Carlos Santos Davey Moore Julian Jackson Mark Medal
Almost as iffy as Mugabi, but of course they faced much more prime notable opposition than Mugabi. Those would have been real wars.