Your care for maidana beating khan is false but more importantly irrelevant. Maidana v morales was for the wba belt because khan is a super champ. That being said, there is as much argument for him to be 5 weight champ as 3 weight champ. In both fights he faded late on and it ultimately cost him. I personally had him winning diaz and drawing maidana but it don't change history.
Man Morales is one hell of a fighter to be a fan of. You rarely ever see a fighter with this absolutely elite level of skill, throwin' down like EM does. Punchin' EM is one of the worst ****in' things you could do in there...LOL. It just charges his batteries.
Even if he won he wouldn't be champ. Khan is the WBA champ, defended against Maidana and is defending next week. That bull**** interim title is nothing but a joke and JC Chavez, JMM, MAB would laugh in his face if he ever claimed to be a 4 division champ with it
no it wasn't. it was for a bs interim title created by the wba on petition by golden boy. interim titles are supposed to be issued when a champ is injured. now the wba have come out and said they will issue one whenever they please to help golden boy sell fights and whenever some popular fighter wants a title but doesn't want to fight the champ.
4 divison absolutely. He beat Diaz. I had his fight with Midana a draw.....but I would have loved to see him get the nod BOTH times.
Morales should've won that fight against Maidana. I wonder why Maidana got no point deducted for his ****ing head.
For as much as id like to say yes i say no.... I was busted when he fought Diaz but i heard Morales should have won... But i saw Maidana and Kahn and although i was rooting for Maidana i couldnt give it to him he lost to many of the early and mid rounds i had Kahn winning 114-111. So therefore i cant consider him a champion, the real champ is Bradley although i think those 2 would be pickem in HTH matchup..... He has to beat one of those guys and i cant see him pulling that off.