If in July 2003,Pacquiao doesn't make that last defence against Lucero, but instead jumps up to face Morales for the WBC featherweight title. Who wins this fight? For me it's an interesting one because whilst we got to see the trilogy there's still a few questions remaining imo. Morales in the first fight made Pacquiao look helpless, he had his way and fought an amazing fight, but then he jumped up to LW, lost, came back down to SFW, was knocked out twice and jumped back up to LW again (where he was robbed blind against Diaz) so there's an argument that Morales was the better fighter prime for prime. But then you can argue that Pacquiao won the trilogy, knocked him out twice a night and all 3 fights took place in within a 2 year period. So what say you, gun to your head who is the superior FW? Pacquiao (winner of the trilogy) Or Morales (winner of the first fight)
