Morales vs Prince Naseem Hamed 126

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by hookfromhell, Oct 23, 2012.


  1. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    Morales had decent workrate, but hes there to be hit, and Hamed is one guy, u dont want to take too many punches from.

    Hamed always respected Morales much more than MAB, he would have prepared much better and even the HAmed who fought MAB has a better chance against Morales than he did against MAB. (Although its only a small chance)
    People need to rewatch the MAB fight again, MAB fought a very cautious, intelligent fight, he had his hands up tight throught he whole fight and not once gave Hamed any oppurtunities at all, He boxed beautifully against a guy who was throwing wild hayemakers

    Clinton, **** Off, your on every Hamed Thread, youve already been exposed on previous threads
     
  2. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,237
    6,500
    Jan 22, 2009
    1st of all, I've never been "exposed" on ESB, least of all from the likes of you, and especially concerning Hamed. 2nd, I'm not "on every Hamed thread," like you incorrectly claim here. Denying it? Look at the present Hamed thread on the General: not one comment from me. 3rd, all I wrote on this thread was that I felt that Morales would have beaten Hamed, nothing more nothing less. You are obviously one paranoid Hamed excusemaker that most definitely belongs on the General and not the Classic. And 4th, aren't you the typical Hamed excusemaker that has written even here on the Classic this beauty of a Hamed excuse (I have documented 10 on these boards): Hamed studied MAB's loss against Junior Jones over and over again in preparation to fighting MAB? If you don't like reading what I write, nobody is holding a gun to your head forcing you to read my comments. Censorship is a very ugly thing in an open forum. Shame on you.
     
  3. kingfisher3

    kingfisher3 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,471
    1,845
    Sep 9, 2011
    i would love to vote for naz, but morales is significantly bigger, naz's a natural 126 (or less) and morales cut down. i'll take morales by 4-5 rds
     
  4. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,571
    3,764
    May 4, 2012
    Oomph....Naz is gonna land somewhere along and Morales just loved to get into a brawl.

    I want to pick Morales by decision but I feel there is a point where he eats one of those uppercuts in close and that's the beginning of the end for him thanks to his willingness to engage, despite his size advantage.
     
  5. Tin_Ribs

    Tin_Ribs Me Full Member

    4,405
    3,881
    Jun 28, 2009
    Oh yeah, I got that. Wasn't trying to be a pain in the arse or anything. :oops::lol:

    Hamed vs Little Red.....oomph. Sick.
     
  6. DDDUUDDDEE

    DDDUUDDDEE Undisputed Ambien (taker) Full Member

    17,608
    23
    Oct 25, 2010
    Morales UD in a fun fight, something like 8-4. I've always thought Naz was a bit overrated.
     
  7. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    Of course not just didn't want you thinking I was!

    Who you got? Or see it as the ultimate unpredictable shootout like I do?
     
  8. Tin_Ribs

    Tin_Ribs Me Full Member

    4,405
    3,881
    Jun 28, 2009
    Aye, mostly this, at least with Hamed as he was circa pre-KK when he still had some bounce and oddballness. Danny has a miles better shot of sparking the Steward/Suarez version, at least on first glance I think.
     
  9. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,070
    35,184
    Jun 23, 2005
    I love Nas but EM would be too much. EM could get into trouble by going to war at times but his better boxing ability would see him to a win over Nas.
     
  10. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    Oh, I agree with your latter analysis wholeheartedly. It'd have to be the very best Naz for him to survive, even though he rarely seemed badly hurt.

    Getting hit flush and suffering flash knockdowns is maintainable against the likes of Daniel Alicea and even Kelley, but if it's Lopez? That's the kinda' **** you don't take too much of when you don't see the shots coming.

    How about the best Chacon (i.e if Lopez fight and not that horror show against Olivares second time round) are we saying he'd take his usual drubbing but just lay way too much on Naz to lose?
     
  11. Shake

    Shake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,633
    58
    May 4, 2007
    Thanks for the compliment, Flea. You're one of the several I think highly of here, so is 'preciated!

    I'd make Naz a favorite over Pacquiao at 126. I think he'd get him out of there.
     
  12. TED 822

    TED 822 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,351
    234
    Jul 10, 2012
    For me,Hamed great to watch in his day,but dont agree that the Mexicans avoided him.I think his management ducked Marquez later in his career and pulled out against another whose name Ive forgotten.I know many will disagree,but I feel Barrera just too good on the night,and probably any other night.Also think Morales would have been the first to keep him on the floor.Naz was one of our best,Erik an all time great,the legend that Naz aspired to be.A hungry fighter,and I think thats what makes the difference.
     
  13. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    No probs Shake, you should post more often, you used to.

    Anyway, such a hard matchup to really pick on.
     
  14. destruction

    destruction Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,758
    13,340
    Mar 26, 2009
    It would be a SD if in england it would Hamed winning