this.. . statistics, situational factors, etc. can always be manipulated, and used to both parties advantage. That's why in such a subjective sport like boxing, I tend to go with the old adage (possibly even hackneyed cliche at this point): "IT IS, WHAT IT IS. . ." I was just talking about how boxing scene had so many biased momos, and turds, and how ESB was much better. . But I've only seen a handful of posters who have supported, given credit to, and critiqued both fighters (regarding their boxing). . . .
Boxing's beauty is that it's subjective. Opinion must be tainted with reason to be valid though. Atleast IMO.
Morales being drained is nothing we haven't known for years now, but the feat of domination was impressive nonetheless.
shut up *****. Don't you know Pacquiao has been drained his whole career until the Diaz fight. That's why he lost to Marquez the first 2 times and why he beat him the thi............
I refuse to believe that the demigod Morales has any losses under his belt. Morales is god among mere mortals.
Its common knowledge that Morales was drained for those pac fights. Erik was on the decline anyway & should have been there for the taking vs pac at any weight but Freddie & co didn`t want to take that chance... same old bull**** but not to worry, their day will come sooner rather than later.