Golovkin - but only until Wilder beats Povetkin. Sasha is clearly better than anyone on Bumlovkin's resume...
I don't think he beats Povetkin, but if he has that on his resume I won't argue with the above. That'd be a massive win
That is a completely wrong ****ogy. Even if most people didn't know boxing, you being in the small minority about Wilder/Golovkin doesn't mean that you are in a small minority that knows boxing. Once again, very bad ana1ogy. This is wrong. Scott has never been top 10 in his career and certainly isn't top 10 by getting stopped by Chisora and Wilder and beating Thompson, who himself is 44 years old and obviously not top 10. Arreola is fat journeyman and Stiverne certainly wasn't top 3 after beating Arreola. Ring Magazine had Stiverne top 3 at that point, but Ring Magazine also had Daniel Geale top 3 at the time Golovkin beat him. Both rankings were incorrect and while they were both legitimately top 10 at the time, neither was top 3. So far you have failed to show any evidence to back up your statement of Wilder being more accomplished. Golovkin has defeated way more top 10 opponents, he has defeated more top 15 and he has defeated more top 20 opponents. Golovkin also has 15 title defenses, Wilder 2 defenses. The only things you have come up with so far were "MW is a **** division" and "Stiverne and Scott are better than anyone on Golovkin's resume".
Easy to compare. One, GGG, is a boxer/fighter. The other, Windmill Wilder, is a bum. Wilder is a cashcow...a product.
GGG. Its not even remotely close. No point pointing at resumes, one has fought the ones brave enough to fight him and the ones that would really sparkle on a resume are too scared to fight him. Wilder has just fought garbage and wants to continue doing so.