More impressive legacy: Jack Johnson or Muhammad Ali?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by jaffay, Sep 29, 2010.


  1. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    This is why I respect Jack Johnson more than almost any boxer. His talent, his skills, could not be denied.

    Top ten heavy in my opinion. He absolutely dominated his era.
     
  2. eslubin

    eslubin Active Member Full Member

    558
    0
    Nov 29, 2009
    Johnson must be in every credible top 3 heavyweight list.
     
  3. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,695
    14,073
    Jan 4, 2008
    Just the fact that he stuffed a sock in his crotch when around whites should probably elevate him to GOAT.:yep Man, Freud should have followed Johnson around like a feeder fish. The money he would have made out of white men with impotency problems...
     
  4. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,491
    9,395
    Jul 17, 2009
    Too right,and it's an absolute mismatch.
     
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,822
    51,907
    Mar 21, 2007
    All things considered, what Johnson did was much harder.
     
  6. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    335
    Jan 29, 2005
  7. TG1

    TG1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,965
    11
    Mar 4, 2010
    Ali via landslide.
     
  8. Pachilles

    Pachilles Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,294
    29
    Nov 15, 2009
    Theyre the same person! Clearly Ali's legacy as a person and achievements in the ring are superior. But he had alot more freedom to do his thing. And his thing was emulating Johnson. The clinching, the mocking, the smiling, even the crazy eye thing Ali used to do he took from Johnson.
     
  9. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    259
    Oct 22, 2009
    True. Ali wanted to be Johnson. Tyson wanted to be Dempsey. Vitali is Willard. :D
     
  10. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,584
    Jul 28, 2004
    To keep it very simple and succinct, Ali.
     
  11. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,997
    28,008
    Feb 15, 2006
    Resume wise they are a lot closer than the modern fan might think.

    If Johnson had rematched Langford, McVea nad Jeanette he could have taken the honours.
     
  12. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,822
    51,907
    Mar 21, 2007

    I would dispute that. I think the work Matt did on yearly rankings proved that. Johnson's best scalp is a middleweight or a teenager...he's a great fighter, and whatever his crimes, a greater man, but I think the gulf in class between resume is about as wide as it is possible to get whilst discussing two great fighters at one weight.
     
  13. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,716
    30,652
    Jun 2, 2006
    I would go for Ali ,because he opened up the big money to boxers, and changed the state of play forever.
     
  14. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,997
    28,008
    Feb 15, 2006
    Firstly, in terms of volume of elite opposition they are prety close.

    Best scalp a middleweight or a teenager?

    Depends on the middleweight/teenager.

    Even so you have corectly identified the deciding factor. Namely that Johnson failed to match the best contenders of his era in their prime, and did not have a challenger of the calibre of a Frazier or Foreman.

    I submit that his chance to rectify this would have been to beat either a prime Jeffries (not his choice) or a prime Langford.

    What he could have done is match two or more of the black dynamite crew while he was champion and that would have gone a long way towards closing the deal, prehaps even if he had split a series.
     
  15. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,695
    14,073
    Jan 4, 2008
    This would really make it interesting. How much do you think the loss to Hart damages him in this context?