More impressive logevity?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by escudo, Mar 9, 2016.


  1. escudo

    escudo Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,298
    4,629
    May 13, 2014
    Foreman or Bernard Hopkins?

    I think B-Hop is just a tad more impressive because he had no massive layoff like Foreman did and it requires a lot more skill and guile to fight the way Bernard does since he wasn't gifted with the tremendous natural power of Foreman. But then Foreman did capture the lineal HWT title with a viscious KO and held his own with an ATG in Holyfield who was prime as a 40+ year old man.

    Thoughts?

    Damn it I can't edit the thread title.
     
  2. Big Ukrainian

    Big Ukrainian Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,647
    9,467
    Jan 10, 2007
    They are both phenomenal.

    Foreman won Olympic gold medal in 1968, and he was World HW lineal champion as early as 1973 and as late as 1997. That's unbelievable.

    Hopkins at 50 fighting for 3 belts 2 divisions above his 'prime' weight is also quite impressive.
     
  3. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Loyal Member Full Member

    31,307
    29,482
    Apr 4, 2005
    I'd say Hopkins longevity is more impressive, older while at the top and more active throughout his career.

    I'd say Archie Moore's longevity was also more impressive than Foremans, maybe even more impressive than Hopkins. Over 200 fights over more than 27 years, compared BHops 66 fights over 27 years or Foremans 81 fights over 28 years only 18 of which were active years.
     
  4. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    Hopkins but not withstanding that foreman took a 10 year evangelical break which is more impressive still.
     
  5. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Loyal Member Full Member

    31,307
    29,482
    Apr 4, 2005
    True, to take that long out from a sport and still be able to compete at the level Foreman did, was phenomenal. I can't think of another athlete that did that. A few years out and coming back is hard especially when past prime, but 10 years out must be a unique feat.

    Foreman was just a prodigious talent. To win an Olympic gold medal within 2 years of first stepping into a ring is another phenomenal achievement of his, he was so raw and basically a novice, yet his physical attributes were enough to overcome his lack of experience.
     
  6. Nighttrain

    Nighttrain 'BOUT IT 'BOUT IT Full Member

    5,292
    977
    Nov 7, 2011
    I asked him if he thought he could have been great at any other sport, I was suprised that he said no, boxing was it.
     
  7. N_ N___

    N_ N___ Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,204
    93
    Oct 1, 2014
    Hopkins. He was splitting fights with the best in a higher weight division in his 40s. He also reigned at middle without any serious hang ups when he was younger whereas Foreman stumbled around from the Ali fight until his first retirement.
     
  8. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    :deal Hopkins by a mile, for these reasons.
     
  9. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,832
    6,596
    Dec 10, 2014
    Hopkins, he didn't take 10 yrs. off and fought at a lower weight, where reflexes matter more.
     
  10. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,124
    8,569
    Jul 17, 2009

    Yes Archie was the King in that way.
     
  11. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,832
    6,596
    Dec 10, 2014
    I look at it the opposite way. He wasn't taking any punishment, which made him physically fresh when he came back at 38.
     
  12. Gr8Mandingo

    Gr8Mandingo Member banned

    470
    1
    Jan 30, 2016
    Definitely B Hop ...he took his more dangerous fights LTE in his career,

    And B-Hop fought till he was older and never really took any time off

    Its damn incredible when u think about it.

    I think of Bhip more like Rchie Moore