More power, prime Hagler or GGG?

Post Golovkin yes. Brook was a beast at 147 prior to that fight. You think it’s a foregone conclusion with Crawford and Spence for Brook before GGG and your a fool

 

Barely.

Just so I know what I'm dealing with, you consider that a great win for Golovkin?

 

So you're going to take the ringside reporters opinion over the 40 pro fighter's opinion that included several all time great living legends like George Foreman, Roberto Duran, Ray Leonard, Mike Tyson, Chavez Sr., including Golovkin's own trainer? Lmao

 

Just one of the 18 out of 20 title challengers that got flattened.

 

You know what, you're right.

Brook is Golovkin's best win.

Now that I'm thinking about it that fight alone cements Golovkin's legacy and made him a shoe in to the BHoF.. No, that fight cemented his place as an ATG MW, probably even a top 100 ATG.



Its embarrassing that Brook is one of Golovkin's best wins. Lol

 

So you think every fight Golovkin won by KO was a great win for Golovkin? Bwahahahhahhahah....

Bro, I thought Pacquiao fans were bad.. gawd damn you take the cake.

 

The 2nd fight was competitive enough to where if your not watching it close enough and get rapped up in the whole mexican style expectations,and you had a few beers ringside, you might get it wrong. Ringside reporters a paid to pay attention and have a detailed report of what they saw, not observe while b.s.ing with someone sitting next to you.

 

How important is Golovkin to you lol

 

They were a very bad and memorable nights for his challengers. Good thing for Canelo he has the judges in his back pocket or we wouldnt even be discussing this. You would be angry that Canelo was 0-2 vs Golovkin, and it would be right in line with the ringside reports.

 

I'm not sure why you watch boxing, maybe you like to see overmatched no hopers get KO, maybe you're just infatuated with Golovkin.

I like boxing for the sport. I like to see competitive fights even if there is no KO involved. In fact, I prefer a competitive chess match over a world level fighter KO a no hope any day of the week.

 

No more than Canelo is to you bro. He is my favorite fighter right now. In every era i have a favorite that kind of leads the way, keeps me interested. In the past it was Ricky Hatton, Trinidad, Michalczewski, and my favorite that made me a boxing fan Thomas "Hitman" Hearns. oh yeah, i got a kick out of Chavez sr as well. I guess i like pressure KO guys best.

 

As l mentioned the type of fighter i like, my favorites have to deal with all types of challenges, sometimes they win sometimes they lose. Hatton beat Tszyu, but failed against Floyd and Pacquiao. I'm kind of like a football fan, i stick by my favorites unless they do something that makes me no longer like them. Tito was Tito to the end, Hatton though had a terrible time with defeat but he was the blue collar answer to Floyd. Hearns had a passion for greatness. I was hoping Michalczewski was going to fight Roy but it never happend. I loved watching Chavez embarrass Camacho.i would like to see GGG fight both Andrade or Charlo and try to unify the middleweight division on the way out, if he dont try I'll be a little disappointed. There are still many Ring mag top 10 challengers out there for a 38-40 year old champ to fight. The middleweight division is pretty strong right now. I respect which ever route GGG takes, his fights are fun to watch.

 

Despite being a big Canelo fan, I don't hold him to different standards like you do with Golovkin, and I don't inflate his accomplishments to ridiculous proportions like you do with Golovkin.

 

You're actually so deluded it's unbelievable. GGG does not have a great resume but at least it's not cherry picked to the extent of Canelo's resume... Canelo literally stacks everything in his favour so he has minimal chance of losing... Youre just a deluded fool tbh, impossible to debate with a fool

 

Very Close.