Alvarez needed his judges though. Just like he needed his PEDs, and he needed to vacate his belt when Golovkin was younger and more dangerous.
5-1 Joshua is bad, as a Joshua fan and a Brit I dont want to be seeing score cards like that coming from fights in the UK. The other 2 i find palatable although i dont agree with them myself.
They have a case of selective seeing! Everything their hero throws lands. Ony 1% of the opponent's punches land. At the end of the day what difference does it make. I had Povetkin winning all 5 rounds and the 6th until.................BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM! Pov was giving AJ a boxing lesson, I see why Wilder ducked him. Nobody in the heavies has the talent and skill of Pov. I saw him land at least 90 power shots and 200 jabs before................BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM! LOL Bunch of sack sucking cry babies!
https://www.reddit.com/r/Boxing/com...ggg_media_scorecards/?st=JM5DGQNE&sh=9a324fe1 I don't reckon you should just roll over and accept it. If the vast majority of boxing pundits had Golovkin on top or a draw, who are you to argue? I'll give you motive for the judges to score as they did..... you give me one for the pundits.
Don't care about what the bias people of the world saw. It matters what I saw and I saw canelos beating GGG 115-113.
Shocking. That judge would've awarded AJ with a wide UD even if Povetkin had sparked him out cold in savage HL fashion lol
Did you see the thread with all the media cards added up. 79% said GGG won. Just 6% felt Canleo won ( some connected to Golden boy ) the rest called it a draw. Those are the facts. ESPN Mexico called it a draw. TV Azteca gave it to GGG. Both prime Mexican networks
Why do people think that when fighting the undefeated Olympic champion, unified alphabet champion & world boxing cash cow from London in London that close rounds should be scored to the visiting fighter? The sport is professional boxing.
Help me clarify. Last weeks fight prompted a lot of anger, anger which I feel is unwarrented. It was a close fight, no one can argue that. The challenger got the nod. I feel the decision was not a big, conspirecy filled robbery. I brought this up in a post and someone replied back, that the benifiet of the doubt should go to the champ. Does that same logic apply to this fight or not? Were the rounds that far apart and clear that Pov did enough to get the win? Or is this just sack sucking taken to another level?