More Skilled: Johnny Tapia or Juan Manuel Marquez ?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Vic-JofreBRASIL, Jul 24, 2012.


  1. Vic-JofreBRASIL

    Vic-JofreBRASIL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,898
    5,255
    Aug 19, 2010
    Is this a good comparison ?? I believe many here rate JMM higher than me, but I think both were similar skilled, both great....

    How do you see this comparison and who was the more skilled?
     
  2. MrBumboclart

    MrBumboclart Active Member Full Member

    663
    9
    Feb 17, 2012
    Neither come close to Eder Jofre. He ranks easily among the top 20 pfp of all times.

    I think JMM is more skilled than Tapia. However Johnny is probably more athletic, his handspeed as super-fly was nasty!

    RIP
     
  3. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    JMM is more disciplined in applying his skills, but he doesn't have a wider skill-set than Tapia. And of course, prime Tapia has an athletic advantage.
     
  4. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    544
    Feb 17, 2010
    Yeah, Marquez the more disciplined superior ring-general...knows how to get the most out of his assets.

    Tapia more versatile and more of a complete natural talent technically, yet devil may care with his ability and less focused on winning at all cost.
     
  5. slip&counter

    slip&counter Gimme some X's and O's Full Member

    24,813
    20
    Jul 23, 2008
  6. salty trunks

    salty trunks Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,740
    80
    Dec 22, 2009
    Id say its a pretty fair comparison. Tapia had very underated boxing skills. Where they differ the most is probably in punching power and Tapia liked to brawl more than box so his power inhibited him quite a bit and probably makes Marquez the better guy because he used his natural abilities better to suit his style than Tapia did.
     
  7. Ilesey

    Ilesey ~ Full Member

    38,201
    2,600
    Jul 22, 2004
    Marquez was the better technician for me. Whilst Tapia was no slouch, Marquez seemed more savvy.
     
  8. luke

    luke Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,360
    9
    May 7, 2012
    offensive tricks/athletic ability is all tapia, but overall i would say tapia, but marquez would most likely beat him.
     
  9. greynotsoold

    greynotsoold Boxing Addict

    5,504
    7,039
    Aug 17, 2011
    Both had (have, in the case of Marquez) a great deal of skill. Before his lay-off, of three years, Tapia was sharper, less emotional, and more of a sharp shooter than he became later on. He still exhibited those qualities in flashes, but was more prone to brawl recklessly. Marquez never loses himself, or his intellect when he fights. So his skills don't get misplace, as often as Tapia was prone to misplace his skill.