More skilled technician: Pernell Whitaker or Ricardo Lopez

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Flo_Raiden, Jul 31, 2019.


  1. Flo_Raiden

    Flo_Raiden Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,791
    25,695
    Oct 12, 2010
    Some great response! It really does come down to which one you prefer.
    I will say that Lopez has the edge in power, offensive variety, and guard while Whitaker had the better upper body and feet movement, defense, and in-fighting. Both had great jabs, footwork, and counter punching skills. Lopez was ‘by the book’ perfect in technique but Whitaker showed more creativity and wasn’t as limited ability wise.
     
    Last edited: Aug 1, 2019
    Pimp C likes this.
  2. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    122,563
    34,376
    Jun 23, 2005
    We will have to agree to disagree. Lopez was a great fighter he fought in a weight class that never traditionally gets much respect.
     
  3. Flo_Raiden

    Flo_Raiden Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,791
    25,695
    Oct 12, 2010
    You'd be surprised by how many people would disagree with you, there's even some that consider him as THE GOAT due to being so dominant (albeit in a so-so division) and never beaten, which I don't agree with. Lopez was pretty weak on the inside and has only fought up close few times, one of them being the Rosendo Alvarez rematch.

    Lopez is one of my all time favorite fighters but I do find him to be both underrated and overrated at the same time, as strange as it sounds. Underrated in a sense that so not many know about him but also overrated in ATG ranking and H2H. He wasn't unbeatable and there are a handful of guys from other eras that could have beaten Lopez like Mark Too Sharp Johnson or Jung Koo Chang. He could have definitely moved up to fight better competition but for some reason he didn't.
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,919
    45,753
    Mar 21, 2007
    I don't agree with you at all Flo. Lopez had the edge in offensive variety? Can we see him do some body-punching on the inside? How about Marquez-like uppercuts up close, he's from that culture, right?

    Lopez doesn't have anything like the technical capabilities that Whitaker had. Unless you mean something really really different by technical capabilities than I understand.
     
    roughdiamond likes this.
  5. Flo_Raiden

    Flo_Raiden Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,791
    25,695
    Oct 12, 2010
    Can't deny Finito's artistic mastery. The guy was like a swordsman in the ring.
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
     
  6. aaalbert

    aaalbert Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,041
    2,022
    Jan 15, 2015
    Log off with that nonsense! (I mean the overrated comment)

    Lopez had the perfect style. Balance, power, no flaw in his game. But Whitaker definitely was the more slicker boxer and more athletic.
    Personally, I enjoy watching Lopez more but both were special fighters.
     
    maac and Pimp C like this.
  7. Flo_Raiden

    Flo_Raiden Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,791
    25,695
    Oct 12, 2010
    Lopez threw great combinations and also had a great uppercut as well. That's how he was able to get some scintillating KOs with his offensive variety.
    Both are very different in a sense that Lopez would not be able to do what Whitaker was capable of doing but he was so good at using the basic style of boxing.
     
    Pimp C likes this.
  8. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,919
    45,753
    Mar 21, 2007
    Lopez was superb at executing his gameplan, which was boxing at distance. Technical excellence in boxing would require that kind of surety at all ranges. Lopez didn't exhibit that, at all. His gameplan in close was to extract himself and he had some decent going-away punches.

    Whitaker was a superb inside fighter. He was superb at mid-range. He was probably marginally better at distance than Lopez. It's a non-comparison. Whitaker was a better technician by miles.
     
    roughdiamond and Flo_Raiden like this.
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,919
    45,753
    Mar 21, 2007
    This content is protected


    It is just not possible to produce a video like this for Lopez. He didn't do that kind of work.
     
    roughdiamond, Pimp C and Flo_Raiden like this.
  10. roughdiamond

    roughdiamond Ridin' the rails... Full Member

    9,934
    18,689
    Jul 25, 2015
    Who did he beat?

    His best win is an older Rosendo Alvarez, who he had major trouble with. His second best win is Ohashi, who Chang beat years before. Guys like Chang, who are basically forgotten, have wins over much better opponents such as Zapata. Some one like Roman Gonzalez is a much greater fighter than Lopez. Do some research.
     
    George Crowcroft and Flo_Raiden like this.
  11. roughdiamond

    roughdiamond Ridin' the rails... Full Member

    9,934
    18,689
    Jul 25, 2015
    And if you like Lopez, I suggest watching Yuri Arbachakov. Better version of Lopez's style, with better wins too.
     
    Flo_Raiden likes this.
  12. Flo_Raiden

    Flo_Raiden Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,791
    25,695
    Oct 12, 2010
    Lopez did beat Saman Sorjaturong, the same guy that would end up knocking out Humberto Gonzalez.
    I agree though, guys like Chang and Zapata are almost forgotten despite having a better resume. I'd favor those 2, along with Roman Gonzalez, against Lopez.
     
    roughdiamond likes this.
  13. Flo_Raiden

    Flo_Raiden Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,791
    25,695
    Oct 12, 2010
    Arbachakov is another favorite of mine as well. His style was poetry in motion and just as great to watch as Lopez. One of the best right hands in the lower weights.
     
    Last edited: Aug 1, 2019
    roughdiamond likes this.