More talented Hatton or Froch

Ricky for me just.

 

Good question. Hatton for me.

 

Hatton by a fraction when it comes to natural talent, when it comes to mentality froch by a long margin

 

Well who would you rather face if you were a pro? Froch for me easily

 

Andre ward? #2 p4p at the time

 

Both a credit to boxing

 

Has Hatton ever skooled anyone the way Froch did to Abraham??

I say Froch wins this argument - but fuk me 2 british greats

 

Hatton has more natural talent, but my word Froch has made the very best of his talent by sheer will.

 

ricky was entertaining but if eamon macgee wasn't a lazy **** his career would have been over sooner

 

Hatton had far better boxing skills, Froch had a far better chin. Hatton closed the distance skilfully, threw untelegraphed hybrid shots (uppercut-jab etc), brilliant side-stepper to create angles, picture-perfect body hooks, beautiful in-and-out rythm at his best with high output of scoring shots (Phillips, Tackie, Oliveira, Urango, Malignaggi, Pacquaio).

Froch is extremely slow in all areas, throws a lazy jab from the low-slung position of his left, struggles to release a right hand with any kind of swift, natural smoothness, and throws uppercuts from out of range that never land! He is great however at taking punches and giving right back toe-to-toe; having the last word in exchanges, and, has a long effective jab when not feeling lazy.

But Hatton, the better talent.

 

The reason Tszyu never knocked Hatton out was a matter of skill and talent on Hatton's part - he closed the distance so fast and so perpetually that Tszyu was unable to get the full extension on his punches, which is where all of Tszyu's power came from; that full extension of the elbow on the end of the punch range. Hatton disallowed that with as much skill and talent as heart and determination, if you know your boxing.

 

Plus he was shot then