More Taylor apologism logic to blacken our boxing universe, debunked.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Amsterdam, Sep 18, 2007.


Page 1 of 2
  1. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    'Pavlik comes right at Taylor, this suits Taylor better than P4P guys like Wright and Hopkins and slick guys like Spinks'

    - Wrong Taylor apologists, pressure ****s him up dearly, but you all can't understand this if it hit you in the face.

    'Taylor is going to box Pavlik, he outboxed Hopkins for christs sakes'

    - Wrong again Taylor apologists, he did not outbox Hopkins, he brought the fight to Hopkins by way of aggression, learn the difference between outboxing and pressing the fight aggressively behind a jab.

    'Jermain Taylor's resume is one of the best in the sport, he is irrefutably a top P4P fighter and has already accomplished so much'

    - Wrong, yet again, what a surprise Taylor apologists. 3 controversial decisions and then victories over overmatched smaller fighters, unimpressively I may add is no more impressive than dominating Tomasz Adamek, which is what Dawson did. How a fight is won is not taken into consideration, nor is the real state of the opponent.

    Taylor deserves no top 10 ranking. The Spinks fight could have been a draw and the Wright fight was a clear win for Wright.

    'Jermain Taylor could very well lose to Pavlik, but he could still have a bright future at 168'

    - Laughable, my Taylor apologising ESB posting mates, Pavlik is a lesser all around fighter than the entire SMW top 10 and will have little success there himself. Before the bout was announced, everyone said Pavlik has technical issue's and is a good solid fighter but not great, now there are talks of him being ranked P4P when he KO's the Taylor fraud.

    Taylor's career as a top fighter ends after Pavlik KO's him.

    'It pisses me off that Taylor gets no flak, he fought Hopkins and Wright and is proven beyond reasonable doubt!'

    - I rest my case.
     
    Amsterdam, Sep 18, 2007
    Amsterdam, Sep 18, 2007
    #1
  2. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    How about giving your BS hatred a rest.... You're like a cross betweem Bigtime9 and Jack Prescott. : :dead
     
    Lance_Uppercut, Sep 18, 2007
    Lance_Uppercut, Sep 18, 2007
    #2
  3. KO Boxing

    KO Boxing Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,055
    4
    Apr 30, 2006
    Yeah... Whatever.
     
    KO Boxing, Sep 18, 2007
    KO Boxing, Sep 18, 2007
    #3
  4. DanePugilist

    DanePugilist God vs God - Death Angel Full Member

    6,837
    2
    Oct 14, 2006
    I agree with every letter, Amsterdam... Top notch.
     
    DanePugilist, Sep 18, 2007
    DanePugilist, Sep 18, 2007
    #4
  5. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    Thankyou good sir.:smoke
     
    Amsterdam, Sep 18, 2007
    Amsterdam, Sep 18, 2007
    #5
  6. DanePugilist

    DanePugilist God vs God - Death Angel Full Member

    6,837
    2
    Oct 14, 2006
    I don't do money nor absence bets... Take it like you will. Nor would I want you to leave either, as I have stated before - its more fun to gloat if people remain.
     
    DanePugilist, Sep 18, 2007
    DanePugilist, Sep 18, 2007
    #6
  7. MSTR

    MSTR More Speed Than Roy!!!!! Full Member

    9,247
    2
    Feb 19, 2005
    Sometimes Amsterdam you are guilty of exageratting. Whilst Margo was over rated, and as you know I picked Williams as well, he was certainly NO journeyman. And as you are right about Taylor not being the elite talent perhaps the Ring percieved him to be, he has proved himself to be world class. Pavlik may very well beat him, but he is not a bum. If he was as bad as you say, Hop, Winky or Spinks would all have beaten him convincingly. I know sometimes your posts are tongue in cheek, but to totally rule Taylor out is a mistake IMO. His chin has not shown weakness yet. And although he hasn't looked great, no one has found a way to dominate him. He is a better technical fighter then Miranda, with more natural talent, and outside of a freakish KO by Pavlik, this will be a closer fight then you think IMO.
     
    MSTR, Sep 18, 2007
    MSTR, Sep 18, 2007
    #7
  8. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:


    I can understand your restlessness buddy . . . time is so near. :D

    Relax and just take a deep breath. The more bull**** you dish out the more shame you're exposing yourself to . . . once Taylor wins.

    You'll be in the HALL of SHAME friend. :yep :good
     
    psychopath, Sep 18, 2007
    psychopath, Sep 18, 2007
    #8
  9. MSTR

    MSTR More Speed Than Roy!!!!! Full Member

    9,247
    2
    Feb 19, 2005
    Time off bets are stupid. Avatar bets are FAR better. I really think it was a dumb move to make a 7 month off bet. You are a good poster Amsterdam, and boxing is never certain as you would know. Your abscence would detract from the board.
     
    MSTR, Sep 18, 2007
    MSTR, Sep 18, 2007
    #9
  10. DanePugilist

    DanePugilist God vs God - Death Angel Full Member

    6,837
    2
    Oct 14, 2006
    You are on - I normally don't do these things, but okay...
     
    DanePugilist, Sep 18, 2007
    DanePugilist, Sep 18, 2007
    #10
  11. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    Ah ah ah . . . no way brother. :nono

    Then the six month signature and avatar bet with me starts when he shows up. That would be prolonging the agony. :rofl:hey

    :good
     
    psychopath, Sep 18, 2007
    psychopath, Sep 18, 2007
    #11
  12. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    When you see how easy this bout is, you will learn why I was so confident in exposing these Taylor apologising fools who lack true analysation skills.
     
    Amsterdam, Sep 18, 2007
    Amsterdam, Sep 18, 2007
    #12
  13. DanePugilist

    DanePugilist God vs God - Death Angel Full Member

    6,837
    2
    Oct 14, 2006
    I can only agree that months off bets are the wrong way to go about it - even if I am certain that Pavlik will win this, and I don't even hold Pavlik in high regard.
     
    DanePugilist, Sep 18, 2007
    DanePugilist, Sep 18, 2007
    #13
  14. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    Do you really have a six months off bet? :think
     
    psychopath, Sep 18, 2007
    psychopath, Sep 18, 2007
    #14
  15. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    Correct, I go for 7 months if I am incorrect. However, the six month bet with you becomes enabled immediatley and stands for six months after my return on top of it, since 6 months of no activity does not count.

    That equals an entire year of feeling the sting for being an ass if I am incorrect.
     
    Amsterdam, Sep 18, 2007
    Amsterdam, Sep 18, 2007
    #15
Page 1 of 2